MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0030-6657(09)70153-2

Медицинская библиотека · Otolaryngologia polska = The Polish otolaryngology · 2009

[Differential diagnosis and treatment of neck masses. A study based on observation in Otolaryngology Department of Miedzyleski Specialistic Hospital in Warsaw].

Rowicki Tomasz, Pietniczka-Załeska Mirosława, Dabrowska-Bień Justyna

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

In otolaryngology practice we quite often encounter neck masses in all age group patients. The differential diagnosis is extensive and represents a variety of pathologic conditions of various origins, especially in relation to patient age. The authors present a retrospective analysis of patients with a neck mass treated in Otolaryngology Department of Miedzyleski Specialistic Hospital in Warsaw over the period of two years. Patients were divided into groups according to their age. Within each group the incidence of congenital, inflammatory and neoplastic disease was assessed. The most numerous was the group of adults older than 40 years of age with the highest incidence of malignant neoplasms. The location of metastatic lymph nodes in relation to primary site was described. Finally, methods of management for each tumour type were presented. Then we discuss a work-up of a neck mass with regard to literature data.

Для цитирования: Rowicki Tomasz, Pietniczka-Załeska Mirosława, Dabrowska-Bień Justyna. [Differential diagnosis and treatment of neck masses. A study based on observation in Otolaryngology Department of Miedzyleski Specialistic Hospital in Warsaw].. Otolaryngologia polska = The Polish otolaryngology. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/s0030-6657(09)70153-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.