MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1024/1422-4917.33.1.27

Медицинская библиотека · Zeitschrift fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie · 2005

[Validation of the German version of the Australian Scale of Asperger's Syndrome (ASAS)].

Melfsen Siebke, Walitza Susanne, Attwood Anthony, Warnke Andreas

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to validate the German version of the Australian Scale for Asperger's Syndrome (ASAS). Furthermore, the scoring of the ASAS as applied by the Australian authors was verified.

METHODS

The mothers of 18 children with Asperger's Syndrome, those of 18 children referred for a possible diagnosis of Asperger's Syndrome, but who did not receive that diagnosis, and the mothers of 15 children with other mental disorders participated in the study. All of the children were inpatients at the University of Wuerzburg Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

RESULTS

According to an analysis of variance, the scale successfully differentiates among the three samples. A stepwise discriminant analysis was performed. Classification results show that the membership of the three groups could be labelled accurately (accuracy rate: 60.78%). The ASAS's scoring methodology appears to yield good results for German patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The scale appears to be an adequate tool for screening purposes in that it correctly discriminates children and adolescents with Asperger's Syndrome.

Для цитирования: Melfsen Siebke, Walitza Susanne, Attwood Anthony, Warnke Andreas. [Validation of the German version of the Australian Scale of Asperger's Syndrome (ASAS)].. Zeitschrift fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie. 2005. DOI: 10.1024/1422-4917.33.1.27.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.