MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1497

Медицинская библиотека · JAMA ophthalmology · 2013

The mycotic ulcer treatment trial: a randomized trial comparing natamycin vs voriconazole.

Prajna N Venkatesh, Krishnan Tiruvengada, Mascarenhas Jeena, Rajaraman Revathi, Prajna Lalitha, Srinivasan Muthiah, Raghavan Anita, Oldenburg Catherine E, Ray Kathryn J, Zegans Michael E, McLeod Stephen D, Porco Travis C, Acharya Nisha R, Lietman Thomas M, Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial Group

Клиническое исследование III фазыСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare topical natamycin vs voriconazole in the treatment of filamentous fungal keratitis.

METHODS

This phase 3, double-masked, multicenter trial was designed to randomize 368 patients to voriconazole (1%) or natamycin (5%), applied topically every hour while awake until reepithelialization, then 4 times daily for at least 3 weeks. Eligibility included smear-positive filamentous fungal ulcer and visual acuity of 20/40 to 20/400.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 3 months; secondary outcomes included corneal perforation and/or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

RESULTS

A total of 940 patients were screened and 323 were enrolled. Causative organisms included Fusarium (128 patients [40%]), Aspergillus (54 patients [17%]), and other filamentous fungi (141 patients [43%]). Natamycintreated cases had significantly better 3-month best spectacle-corrected visual acuity than voriconazole-treated cases (regression coefficient=0.18 logMAR; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.05; P=.006). Natamycin-treated cases were less likely to have perforation or require therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (odds ratio=0.42; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.80; P=.009). Fusarium cases fared better with natamycin than with voriconazole (regression coefficient=0.41 logMAR; 95% CI,0.61 to 0.20; P<.001; odds ratio for perforation=0.06; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.28; P<.001), while non-Fusarium cases fared similarly (regression coefficient=0.02 logMAR; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.13; P=.81; odds ratio for perforation=1.08; 95% CI, 0.48 to 2.43; P=.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Natamycin treatment was associated with significantly better clinical and microbiological outcomes than voriconazole treatment for smear-positive filamentous fungal keratitis, with much of the difference attributable to improved results in Fusarium cases.

APPLICATION TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Voriconazole should not be used as monotherapy in filamentous keratitis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00996736

Для цитирования: Prajna N Venkatesh, Krishnan Tiruvengada, Mascarenhas Jeena, Rajaraman Revathi, Prajna Lalitha, Srinivasan Muthiah, Raghavan Anita, Oldenburg Catherine E, Ray Kathryn J, Zegans Michael E, McLeod Stephen D, Porco Travis C, Acharya Nisha R, Lietman Thomas M, Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial Group. The mycotic ulcer treatment trial: a randomized trial comparing natamycin vs voriconazole.. JAMA ophthalmology. 2013. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1497.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.