Histopathology · 2025
Challenges of a tailored immunohistochemistry algorithm for uterine leiomyosarcoma: an integrated analysis of leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei and fumarate hydratase (FH) deficiency.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alves-Vale Catarina, Truffaux Nathalène, Velasco Valérie, Azmani Rihab, Alamé Melissa, Rebier Flora, Mayeur Laetitia, Leger Yanick, Hostein Isabelle, Soubeyran Isabelle, Blanchard Larry, Marion Estelle, Fontanges Quitterie, Le Loarer François, Averous Gerlinde, Genestie Catherine, Arnould Laurent, Devouassoux-Shisheboran Mojgan, Croce Sabrina
Аннотация
AIMS: Leiomyomas (LM) are the most common uterine mesenchymal neoplasms and encompass a variety of histological subtypes. Bizarre nuclei are described in both leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei (LM-BN) and fumarate hydratase-deficient leiomyomas (FH-LM), which raise diagnostic concerns regarding leiomyosarcoma (LMS). Recently, an immunohistochemical algorithm to support the diagnosis of LMS based on the genomic landscape of these neoplasms was proposed. This study aimed to evaluate the algorithm's accuracy in distinguishing LM-BN and FH-LM from LMS.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We collected 68 LM (29 LM-BN, 30 FH-LM, and 9 LM) and 9 LMS, along with clinicopathological and molecular data. An immunohistochemical panel comprising p53, Rb, PTEN, ATRX, DAXX, and MDM2 was applied. Nine cases were non-interpretable due to fixation issues. The algorithm demonstrated 100% accuracy for LM without bizarre nuclei (9/9) and for nonmyxoid LMS (5/5). Notably, 28.6% (14/49) of LM-BN and FH-LM exhibited at least two abnormalities, leading to potential misclassification as LMS. However, their clinical course, morphology, and genomic profile supported a benign diagnosis. Frequent alterations included Rb (20/49; 40.8%) and p53 (19/49; 38.8%), particularly in bizarre cells, while no abnormal staining was observed for ATRX, DAXX, or MDM2.
CONCLUSION: The proposed algorithm has limitations in differentiating LMS from LM-BN and FH-LM, misclassifying 28.6% of the latter. Accurate interpretation requires proper internal controls, particularly for markers whose loss of expression favours malignancy. Morphology remains central for diagnosis, although integration of molecular data may provide additional insights for a definitive classification in challenging cases.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We collected 68 LM (29 LM-BN, 30 FH-LM, and 9 LM) and 9 LMS, along with clinicopathological and molecular data. An immunohistochemical panel comprising p53, Rb, PTEN, ATRX, DAXX, and MDM2 was applied. Nine cases were non-interpretable due to fixation issues. The algorithm demonstrated 100% accuracy for LM without bizarre nuclei (9/9) and for nonmyxoid LMS (5/5). Notably, 28.6% (14/49) of LM-BN and FH-LM exhibited at least two abnormalities, leading to potential misclassification as LMS. However, their clinical course, morphology, and genomic profile supported a benign diagnosis. Frequent alterations included Rb (20/49; 40.8%) and p53 (19/49; 38.8%), particularly in bizarre cells, while no abnormal staining was observed for ATRX, DAXX, or MDM2.
CONCLUSION: The proposed algorithm has limitations in differentiating LMS from LM-BN and FH-LM, misclassifying 28.6% of the latter. Accurate interpretation requires proper internal controls, particularly for markers whose loss of expression favours malignancy. Morphology remains central for diagnosis, although integration of molecular data may provide additional insights for a definitive classification in challenging cases.