MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2025-022607

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ global health · 2026

Spatial exploration of the impact of cattle on risk of malarial infection using data from a cluster randomised trial.

Sanz Gutierrez Almudena, Otuko Rachel, Xie Kexin, Omondi Isaiah, Kariukiu Mercy, Ruiz-Castillo Paula, Wanjiku Caroline, Brazeal Aurelia, Ngama Mwanajuma, Onyango Truphena, Kazungu Karisa, Mael Mary, Wangari Winnie, Nuru Khadija, Ringera Isaac, Mbarak Jamal, Mramba Shadrack, Kibet Yegon, Nyambura Naomi, Wanjiru Scholastica, Hammann Felix, Saute Francisco, Mwangangi Joseph, Rabinovich N Regina, Maia Marta, Rist Cassidy, Chaccour Carlos

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

In the context of stalled progress in reducing malaria burden and ongoing efforts to develop novel vector control methods, there is ongoing debate about the impact of livestock on malaria transmission. Zooprophylaxis refers to the use of livestock as an alternate source of blood that diverts mosquito vectors away from humans, potentially reducing malaria transmission. However, conflicting evidence highlights the concept of zoopotentiation, where livestock may instead increase vector populations and enhance malaria transmission. Prior studies that explore these concepts have examined livestock as a household asset, which does not account for the geospatial effect of animals owned by neighbours around the home.

METHODS

We implemented a novel spatial approach to explore the impact of cattle on the risk of malarial infection in coastal Kenya. Using data with high granularity from a recent randomised controlled trial, we measured the presence of animals at increasing concentric areas around the household. We fit binomial regression models with generalised estimating equations to explore how cattle density and cattle-to-human-ratio measures were related to malaria prevalence in children 5-15 years old, accounting for relevant environmental and socio-economic variables.

RESULTS

Our findings show that cattle density measured at 400, 500, and 600 m around the household (ORs: 1.63, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.21; 1.84, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.80 and 2.04, 95% CI 1.13 to 3.67, respectively) and cattle-to-human ratio at 500 and 600 m (ORs: 2.73, 95% CI 1.45 to 5.41 and 2.32, 95% CI 1.11 to 4.86, respectively) are significantly related to higher odds of testing positive for malaria. We did not find a significant association at closer distances (<400 m) or when cattle were evaluated only as a household asset.

CONCLUSION

To better understand the impact of livestock on malaria transmission and potentially develop vector control strategies that account for these impacts, future research should consider animals as an environmental exposure and not only as a household asset.

Для цитирования: Sanz Gutierrez Almudena, Otuko Rachel, Xie Kexin, Omondi Isaiah, Kariukiu Mercy, Ruiz-Castillo Paula, Wanjiku Caroline, Brazeal Aurelia, Ngama Mwanajuma, Onyango Truphena, Kazungu Karisa, Mael Mary, Wangari Winnie, Nuru Khadija, Ringera Isaac, Mbarak Jamal, Mramba Shadrack, Kibet Yegon, Nyambura Naomi, Wanjiru Scholastica, Hammann Felix, Saute Francisco, Mwangangi Joseph, Rabinovich N Regina, Maia Marta, Rist Cassidy, Chaccour Carlos. Spatial exploration of the impact of cattle on risk of malarial infection using data from a cluster randomised trial.. BMJ global health. 2026. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2025-022607.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.