Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
Submucosal Saline Injection Followed by Endoscopic Ultrasound versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Only for Distinguishing between T1a and T1b Esophageal Cancer.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
He Long-Jun, Xie Chuanbo, Wang Zi-Xian, Li Yin, Xiao Yi-Tai, Gao Xiao-Yan, Shan Hong-Bo, Luo Lin-Na, Chen Li-Ming, Luo Guang-Yu, Yang Ping, Zeng Shuo-Chun, Xu Guo-Liang, Li Jian-Jun
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To examine whether submucosal saline injection (SSI) can improve traditional endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) accuracy in distinguishing between T1a and T1b stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with T1N0M0 stage ESCC (n = 180) ages 18 to 85 years were enrolled between February 14, 2012 to June 4, 2018 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (Guangdong, China). They were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either EUS examination after 3-5 mL SSI or EUS only examination. All the patients were referred to thoracic surgeons to receive endoscopic resection (ER) or esophagectomy 5 to 10 days after EUS examination. Standard EUS criteria were used to preoperatively stage the ESCC cases, and surgical pathology reports after referral were used to postoperatively stage the cases. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic accuracy of T1b staging [defined as the sum of the true positive (T1b) and true negative (T1a) cases divided by the total number of cases].
RESULTS: Among the per-protocol population, the SSI+EUS group (n = 81) was superior to the EUS-only group (n = 85) in terms of the diagnostic accuracy for T1b staging [93.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 88.6-99.1) vs. 65.9% (95% CI, 55.8-76.0); P < 0.001]. The positive predictive value of SSI+EUS for diagnosing T1b ESCC reached 90.9% (95% CI, 81.1-100), which was significantly superior to that of EUS only [0.576 (0.450-0.702), P = 0.001].
CONCLUSIONS: SSI significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy of EUS in distinguishing between T1a and T1b ESCC, which might help avoid unnecessary esophagectomy and diagnostic ER.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with T1N0M0 stage ESCC (n = 180) ages 18 to 85 years were enrolled between February 14, 2012 to June 4, 2018 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (Guangdong, China). They were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either EUS examination after 3-5 mL SSI or EUS only examination. All the patients were referred to thoracic surgeons to receive endoscopic resection (ER) or esophagectomy 5 to 10 days after EUS examination. Standard EUS criteria were used to preoperatively stage the ESCC cases, and surgical pathology reports after referral were used to postoperatively stage the cases. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic accuracy of T1b staging [defined as the sum of the true positive (T1b) and true negative (T1a) cases divided by the total number of cases].
RESULTS: Among the per-protocol population, the SSI+EUS group (n = 81) was superior to the EUS-only group (n = 85) in terms of the diagnostic accuracy for T1b staging [93.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 88.6-99.1) vs. 65.9% (95% CI, 55.8-76.0); P < 0.001]. The positive predictive value of SSI+EUS for diagnosing T1b ESCC reached 90.9% (95% CI, 81.1-100), which was significantly superior to that of EUS only [0.576 (0.450-0.702), P = 0.001].
CONCLUSIONS: SSI significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy of EUS in distinguishing between T1a and T1b ESCC, which might help avoid unnecessary esophagectomy and diagnostic ER.