MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/jpids/piab119

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2022

Immunization for Children Living With HIV: A Scoping Review.

Kampiire Leatitia, Archary Moherndran, Frigati Lisa, Penazatto Martina, Brusamento Serena

СтатьяМетаанализScoping ReviewПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppression secondary to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) increases the risk of vaccine-preventable diseases in children living with HIV (CLHIV). Although vaccines are cost-effective interventions, their efficacy, immunogenicity, safety, and persistence of post-vaccination immunity in CLHIV receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) is unclear. We aimed at identifying existing scientific evidence on immunization of CLHIV generated in the last 10 years to identify the need for a systematic review.

METHODS

Studies were identified using a broad search strategy applied in multiple databases. Included studies involved CLHIV aged 0-10 years and presented outcomes on safety, efficacy, effectiveness, immunogenicity, and use of booster vaccines.

RESULTS

Nineteen publications were identified. There was variable immunogenicity to and efficacy of vaccines by HIV and ART status. All vaccines were safe.

CONCLUSION

The heterogeneity of available studies makes it complex to do a systematic review and meta-analysis. A more uniform approach to sampling and follow-up in future studies would make comparison and interpretation of results more robust.

Для цитирования: Kampiire Leatitia, Archary Moherndran, Frigati Lisa, Penazatto Martina, Brusamento Serena. Immunization for Children Living With HIV: A Scoping Review.. Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. 2022. DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piab119.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.