MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/lary.27445

Медицинская библиотека · The Laryngoscope · 2018

Outcome measures for pediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction: International consensus statement.

Balakrishnan Karthik, Sidell Douglas R, Bauman Nancy M, Bellia-Munzon Gaston F, Boesch R Paul, Bromwich Matthew, Cofer Shelagh A, Daines Cori, de Alarcon Alessandro, Garabedian Nöel, Hart Catherine K, Ida Jonathan B, Leboulanger Nicolas, Manning Peter B, Mehta Deepak K, Monnier Philippe, Myer Charles M, Prager Jeremy D, Preciado Diego, Propst Evan J, Rahbar Reza, Russell John, Rutter Michael J, Thierry Briac, Thompson Dana M, Torre Michele, Varela Patricio, Vijayasekaran Shyan, White David R, Wineland Andre M, Wood Robert E, Wootten Christopher T, Zur Karen, Cotton Robin T

Consensus StatementСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Develop multidisciplinary and international consensus on patient, disease, procedural, and perioperative factors, as well as key outcome measures and complications, to be reported for pediatric airway reconstruction studies.

METHODS

Standard Delphi methods were applied. Participants proposed items in three categories: 1) patient/disease characteristics, 2) procedural/intraoperative/perioperative factors, and 3) outcome measures and complications. Both general and anatomic site-specific measures were elicited. Participants also suggested specific operations to be encompassed by this project. We then used iterative ranking and review to develop consensus lists via a priori Delphi consensus criteria.

RESULTS

Thirty-three pediatric airway experts from eight countries in North and South America, Europe, and Australia participated, representing otolaryngology (including International Pediatric Otolaryngology Group members), pulmonology, general surgery, and cardiothoracic surgery. Consensus led to inclusion of 19 operations comprising open expansion, resection, and slide procedures of the larynx, trachea, and bronchi as well as three endoscopic procedures. Consensus was achieved on multiple patient/comorbidity (10), disease/stenosis (7), perioperative-/intraoperative-/procedure-related (16) factors. Consensus was reached on multiple outcome and complication measures, both general and site-specific (8 general, 13 supraglottic, 15 glottic, 17 subglottic, 8 cervical tracheal, 12 thoracic tracheal). The group was able to clarify how each outcome should be measured, with specific instruments defined where applicable.

CONCLUSION

This consensus statement provides a framework to communicate results consistently and reproducibly, facilitating meta-analyses, quality improvement, transfer of information, and surgeon self-assessment. It also clarifies expert opinion on which patient, disease, procedural, and outcome measures may be important to consider in any pediatric airway reconstruction patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 Laryngoscope, 129:244-255, 2019.

Для цитирования: Balakrishnan Karthik, Sidell Douglas R, Bauman Nancy M, Bellia-Munzon Gaston F, Boesch R Paul, Bromwich Matthew, Cofer Shelagh A, Daines Cori, de Alarcon Alessandro, Garabedian Nöel, Hart Catherine K, Ida Jonathan B, Leboulanger Nicolas, Manning Peter B, Mehta Deepak K, Monnier Philippe, Myer Charles M, Prager Jeremy D, Preciado Diego, Propst Evan J, Rahbar Reza, Russell John, Rutter Michael J, Thierry Briac, Thompson Dana M, Torre Michele, Varela Patricio, Vijayasekaran Shyan, White David R, Wineland Andre M, Wood Robert E, Wootten Christopher T, Zur Karen, Cotton Robin T. Outcome measures for pediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction: International consensus statement.. The Laryngoscope. 2018. DOI: 10.1002/lary.27445.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.