Cornea · 2022
Cross-Linking Improves the Quality of Life of People With Keratoconus: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Study From the Save Sight Keratoconus Registry.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kandel Himal, Chen Jern Yee, Sahebjada Srujana, Chong Elaine W, Wiffen Steven, Watson Stephanie L
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the patient-reported quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes after corneal cross-linking for keratoconus.
METHODS: This Save Sight Keratoconus Registry study used cross-sectional and longitudinal designs. For the cross-sectional study, 532 patients with keratoconus (mean age 30.9 ± 11.9 years; 31.6% female) completed the Keratoconus Outcomes Research Questionnaire (KORQ) and 343 patients with keratoconus (mean age 28.3 ± 10.7 years; 32.7% female) completed the Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) questionnaires. Similarly, for the longitudinal study, 39 patients (mean age 24.2 ± 8.4 years; 23.1% female) completed the KORQ and 16 patients (mean age 27.9 ± 17.1 years; 50.0% female) completed the IVI questionnaire before and after 6 months of cross-linking. The QoL data were analyzed using the Andrich Rating Scale Model of Rasch analysis.
RESULTS: For both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, the KORQ and IVI scales demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties [ordered and well-spaced categories, variance explained by the measure 52%-73%, person separation index 2.4-3.9, and fit statistics <1.3 (most cases)]. The patients who had not undergone corneal cross-linking had worse mean activity limitation than those with cross-linking ( P = 0.008). However, the differences in symptoms and emotional scores between the groups were not statistically significant (both P > 0.05). The longitudinal study showed that cross-linking was associated with improved activity limitation, symptoms, and emotional scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The KORQ and IVI are psychometrically robust tools to evaluate the QoL outcomes of corneal cross-linking. Cross-linking is associated with improved activity limitation, symptoms, and emotional status.
METHODS: This Save Sight Keratoconus Registry study used cross-sectional and longitudinal designs. For the cross-sectional study, 532 patients with keratoconus (mean age 30.9 ± 11.9 years; 31.6% female) completed the Keratoconus Outcomes Research Questionnaire (KORQ) and 343 patients with keratoconus (mean age 28.3 ± 10.7 years; 32.7% female) completed the Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) questionnaires. Similarly, for the longitudinal study, 39 patients (mean age 24.2 ± 8.4 years; 23.1% female) completed the KORQ and 16 patients (mean age 27.9 ± 17.1 years; 50.0% female) completed the IVI questionnaire before and after 6 months of cross-linking. The QoL data were analyzed using the Andrich Rating Scale Model of Rasch analysis.
RESULTS: For both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, the KORQ and IVI scales demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties [ordered and well-spaced categories, variance explained by the measure 52%-73%, person separation index 2.4-3.9, and fit statistics <1.3 (most cases)]. The patients who had not undergone corneal cross-linking had worse mean activity limitation than those with cross-linking ( P = 0.008). However, the differences in symptoms and emotional scores between the groups were not statistically significant (both P > 0.05). The longitudinal study showed that cross-linking was associated with improved activity limitation, symptoms, and emotional scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The KORQ and IVI are psychometrically robust tools to evaluate the QoL outcomes of corneal cross-linking. Cross-linking is associated with improved activity limitation, symptoms, and emotional status.