Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2009
Differential effects of the site of permanent epicardial pacing on left ventricular synchrony and function in the young: implications for lead placement.
Контролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gebauer Roman A, Tomek Viktor, Kubus Petr, Rázek Vít, Matejka Tomás, Salameh Aida, Kostelka Martin, Janousek Jan
Аннотация
AIMS: To analyse left ventricular (LV) synchrony and function with respect to the epicardial pacing site in the young.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Left ventricular function and synchrony (M-mode, speckle tracking) were evaluated during mid-term follow-up in 32 children with complete non-surgical (n = 15) or surgical (n = 17) atrioventricular block (structural heart disease in 21/32) paced from LV apex (n = 19), right ventricular (RV) apex (n = 7), and RV free wall (n = 6), respectively. Data are in the following order: LV apical, RV apical, and RV free wall pacing. Septal to posterior wall motion delay (SPWMD) = median 0, 69, and 136 ms (P < 0.001), septal to lateral mechanical delay = 54 +/- 29, 73 +/- 24, and 129 +/- 70 ms (P = 0.001), apical to basal mechanical delay = 96 +/- 37, 106 +/- 50, and 79 +/- 18 ms (P NS), and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) = 57 +/- 9, 49 +/- 12, and 33 +/- 10% (P < 0.001), respectively. Left ventricular ejection fraction correlated negatively with SPWMD (R(2) = 0.454, P < 0.001) and septal to lateral mechanical delay (R(2) = 0.320, P < 0.001) but not with apical to basal mechanical delay. Right ventricular free wall pacing (P = 0.014) and SPWMD (P = 0.044) were negative multivariable predictors of LVEF.
CONCLUSION: Compared with other sites, LV apical pacing preserves septal to lateral LV synchrony and systolic function and may be the preferred epicardial pacing site in the young.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Left ventricular function and synchrony (M-mode, speckle tracking) were evaluated during mid-term follow-up in 32 children with complete non-surgical (n = 15) or surgical (n = 17) atrioventricular block (structural heart disease in 21/32) paced from LV apex (n = 19), right ventricular (RV) apex (n = 7), and RV free wall (n = 6), respectively. Data are in the following order: LV apical, RV apical, and RV free wall pacing. Septal to posterior wall motion delay (SPWMD) = median 0, 69, and 136 ms (P < 0.001), septal to lateral mechanical delay = 54 +/- 29, 73 +/- 24, and 129 +/- 70 ms (P = 0.001), apical to basal mechanical delay = 96 +/- 37, 106 +/- 50, and 79 +/- 18 ms (P NS), and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) = 57 +/- 9, 49 +/- 12, and 33 +/- 10% (P < 0.001), respectively. Left ventricular ejection fraction correlated negatively with SPWMD (R(2) = 0.454, P < 0.001) and septal to lateral mechanical delay (R(2) = 0.320, P < 0.001) but not with apical to basal mechanical delay. Right ventricular free wall pacing (P = 0.014) and SPWMD (P = 0.044) were negative multivariable predictors of LVEF.
CONCLUSION: Compared with other sites, LV apical pacing preserves septal to lateral LV synchrony and systolic function and may be the preferred epicardial pacing site in the young.