Coexistence of monogamy and polygyny in Triatoma infestans: fine-scale genealogical structure reveals complex social structures within domestic colonies in the Bolivian Chaco.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Persistent reinfestation of Triatoma infestans in the Gran Chaco undermines Chagas disease (CD) control. While insecticide resistance is a known factor, the fine-scale social and demographic structure of vector colonies remains poorly understood.
OBJECTIVES
To analyse the micro-geographic genetic structure, mating systems, and demographic history of T. infestans in a rural community in the Bolivian Chaco.
METHODS
We genotyped 381 individuals from three neighbouring structures (domiciliary and peridomestic) using eight highly polymorphic microsatellite loci (expected heterozygosity, HE = 0.675). Genealogical relationships were reconstructed using maximum likelihood (ML) analysis (COLONY), and demographic history was inferred through heterozygosity tests.
FINDINGS: The infestation comprised 42 distinct full-sibling families nested within a single colony. We observed a stark dichotomy: two dominant families (> 80 individuals) exhibited monogamy and signs of distinct demographic histories (one in expansion, one recovering from a bottleneck), while 40 minor families showed high promiscuity (polygyny/polyandry). Finite growth rates varied significantly (λ = 1.03 vs 1.22), evidencing active intra-colonial competition.
MAIN
CONCLUSIONS
Domestic populations are not random aggregates, but complex mosaics of coexisting lineages with different adaptive strategies. The dominance of monogamous families suggests a priority effect advantage, while the "tail" of promiscuous minor families represents a cryptic reservoir. Effective control must account for this structural resilience, as surviving minor lineages could rapidly recolonise the niche.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.