Zhonghua kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Zhonghua kouqiang yixue zazhi = Chinese journal of stomatology · 2016
[Evaluation of the orthodontic treatment outcome in patients with impacted maxillary central incisor in the mixed dentition].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cheng Can, Li Xiaotong, Liu He
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the orthodontic treatment outcome in patients with impacted maxillary central incisor in the mixed dentition.
METHODS: Nine patients, aged 8 to 11 years, with impacted maxillary central incisor were treated orthodontically. The cone-beam CT(CBCT) was taken before treatment, after treatment and one year out of retention to evaluate the root length, root canal wall thickness, width of the apical foramen, and degree of root bending, alveolar bone height and thickness. The crown-to-root ratio was calculated. The periodontal and endodontic conditions were evaluated. The parameters of the treated incisors and contralateral ones served as controls were compared.
RESULTS: Nine impacted teeth were treated successfully. Throughout the treatment, the root of impacted central incisor continued to develop and the alveolar bones also continued to develop and remodel. The condition of the alveolar bone of vertically impacted teeth was better than that of horizontally impacted ones. No periodontal pocket or pulp necrosis was found after treatment. Seven patients were examined one year after treatment. No significant difference was found in root length, palatal alveolar bone level and palatal alveolar bone thickness. The control group root length was (13.07±2.15) mm, the treatment group root length was (12.06±2.00) mm. No further alveolar bone loss, gingival recession and pulp necrosis were found. The control group labial and palatal alveolar bone levels were (0.90±0.62), (0.45±0.52) mm, labial and palatal alveolar bone thickness were (0.85±0.14), (1.21±0.41) mm. The treatment group labial and palatal alveolar bone levels were (2.18±1.59) mm, (0.57±0.71) mm, labial and palatal alveolar bone thickness were (0.48±0.29), (1.43±0.31) mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontic therapy for impacted maxillary central incisor in the mixed dentition could promote root development and alveolar bone remodeling. Good periodontal and endodontic conditions were achieved.
METHODS: Nine patients, aged 8 to 11 years, with impacted maxillary central incisor were treated orthodontically. The cone-beam CT(CBCT) was taken before treatment, after treatment and one year out of retention to evaluate the root length, root canal wall thickness, width of the apical foramen, and degree of root bending, alveolar bone height and thickness. The crown-to-root ratio was calculated. The periodontal and endodontic conditions were evaluated. The parameters of the treated incisors and contralateral ones served as controls were compared.
RESULTS: Nine impacted teeth were treated successfully. Throughout the treatment, the root of impacted central incisor continued to develop and the alveolar bones also continued to develop and remodel. The condition of the alveolar bone of vertically impacted teeth was better than that of horizontally impacted ones. No periodontal pocket or pulp necrosis was found after treatment. Seven patients were examined one year after treatment. No significant difference was found in root length, palatal alveolar bone level and palatal alveolar bone thickness. The control group root length was (13.07±2.15) mm, the treatment group root length was (12.06±2.00) mm. No further alveolar bone loss, gingival recession and pulp necrosis were found. The control group labial and palatal alveolar bone levels were (0.90±0.62), (0.45±0.52) mm, labial and palatal alveolar bone thickness were (0.85±0.14), (1.21±0.41) mm. The treatment group labial and palatal alveolar bone levels were (2.18±1.59) mm, (0.57±0.71) mm, labial and palatal alveolar bone thickness were (0.48±0.29), (1.43±0.31) mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontic therapy for impacted maxillary central incisor in the mixed dentition could promote root development and alveolar bone remodeling. Good periodontal and endodontic conditions were achieved.