Journal of dentistry · 2025
Five-year survival analysis of occlusal and proximal restorations performed in non-compliant children.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carvalho Thiago Saads, Un-Arm Chutima, Jeganathan Suvaniya, Hug Tiziana, Wierichs Richard Johannes, Meyer-Lueckel Hendrik, Niemeyer Samira Helena
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the survival of occlusal and proximal restorations in deciduous molars of non-compliant children treated under midazolam or nitrous oxide/oxygen (N₂O/O₂) and evaluate predictors of failure.
METHODS: A total of 151 children (517 teeth) received occlusal (102 patients; 228 teeth) or proximal (105 patients; 289 teeth) restorations-and were assessed over 5 years. Kaplan-Meier survival and multilevel Cox proportional hazards models were applied, assessing patient-level (level 2) and tooth-level (level 1) variables-age, sex, restorative need, sedation type, cooperation, jaw, tooth side, isolation, and material.
RESULTS: 16 children (60 teeth) received N₂O/O₂, 112 children (373 teeth) midazolam, and 23 children (84 teeth) no sedation. Sedation method was not related to restoration failures. Estimated survival at 48 months was 50 % for occlusal, and 60 % at 60 months for proximal restorations (p = 0.072). Occlusal failures were more likely in younger children (p < 0.05), lower jaw (p = 0.046), and with glass ionomer cements (GIC; p = 0.028), while proximal restorations failures occurred more likely in lower molars (p = 0.024) and with GIC (p = 0.003). Overall, predictors for occlusal and proximal failures were: younger age (HR = 0.27, p = 0.030); lower jaw (HR = 2.09, p = 0.001); and GIC (HR = 3.72, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Neither restoration type nor sedation method were significant factors. Overall, restorations in non-compliant children are more likely to fail when placed in younger patients, in lower molars, or when glass ionomer cements are used.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although sedation can help non-compliant children, these patients can still be difficult to treat. This study highlights that neither cavity type nor sedation method predicts restoration failures; instead, patient age, tooth location, and restorative material are key factors. These findings can help clinicians make evidence-based choices to improve treatment outcomes in pediatric patients requiring sedation.
METHODS: A total of 151 children (517 teeth) received occlusal (102 patients; 228 teeth) or proximal (105 patients; 289 teeth) restorations-and were assessed over 5 years. Kaplan-Meier survival and multilevel Cox proportional hazards models were applied, assessing patient-level (level 2) and tooth-level (level 1) variables-age, sex, restorative need, sedation type, cooperation, jaw, tooth side, isolation, and material.
RESULTS: 16 children (60 teeth) received N₂O/O₂, 112 children (373 teeth) midazolam, and 23 children (84 teeth) no sedation. Sedation method was not related to restoration failures. Estimated survival at 48 months was 50 % for occlusal, and 60 % at 60 months for proximal restorations (p = 0.072). Occlusal failures were more likely in younger children (p < 0.05), lower jaw (p = 0.046), and with glass ionomer cements (GIC; p = 0.028), while proximal restorations failures occurred more likely in lower molars (p = 0.024) and with GIC (p = 0.003). Overall, predictors for occlusal and proximal failures were: younger age (HR = 0.27, p = 0.030); lower jaw (HR = 2.09, p = 0.001); and GIC (HR = 3.72, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Neither restoration type nor sedation method were significant factors. Overall, restorations in non-compliant children are more likely to fail when placed in younger patients, in lower molars, or when glass ionomer cements are used.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although sedation can help non-compliant children, these patients can still be difficult to treat. This study highlights that neither cavity type nor sedation method predicts restoration failures; instead, patient age, tooth location, and restorative material are key factors. These findings can help clinicians make evidence-based choices to improve treatment outcomes in pediatric patients requiring sedation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansFemaleMaleDental Restoration FailureDental Restoration, PermanentGlass Ionomer CementsChildMolarTooth, DeciduousChild, PreschoolAge FactorsNitrous OxideHypnotics and SedativesFollow-Up StudiesSurvival AnalysisAnesthesia, DentalKaplan-Meier EstimateProportional Hazards ModelsDental MaterialsProcedural SedationOxygen