MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Jornal de pediatria · 2004

[Marcus Gunn Phenomenon: differential diagnosis of palpebral ptoses in children].

Torres Marcia R F, Calixto Nassin, Oliveira Luiz R, Steiner Sílvia A, Iscold Amarilis M

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper is to review existing literature on the subject and to report on and discuss a case of Marcus Gunn Phenomenon.

DESCRIPTION: A five year-old female, otherwise a healthy patient, while still a few months old, was seen by a pediatrician who detected a disorder of the right eye, initially believed to be strabismus, at a follow-up childcare consultation. Several ophthalmologists failed to establish a precise diagnosis. After a pediatric ophthalmologist had examined the child at four years of age, a diagnosis of Marcus Gunn Phenomenon, otherwise known as jaw-winking phenomenon, was confirmed. Apart from this anomaly, physical, ophthalmological, and neurological examinations were normal. Since ptosis was mild and no association with strabismus, amblyopia or other conditions was established, no surgical procedures were necessary.

COMMENTS: This report is an alert to pediatricians regarding the presence of this largely unknown phenomenon, making it possible for pediatricians to identify the phenomenon, refer the patient to an ophthalmologist, and establish differential diagnosis from other, more severe forms of ptosis, requiring more aggressive treatment.

Для цитирования: Torres Marcia R F, Calixto Nassin, Oliveira Luiz R, Steiner Sílvia A, Iscold Amarilis M. [Marcus Gunn Phenomenon: differential diagnosis of palpebral ptoses in children].. Jornal de pediatria. 2004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.