International journal of cardiology · 2020
The extent and location of late gadolinium enhancement predict defibrillator shock and cardiac mortality in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barison Andrea, Aimo Alberto, Mirizzi Gianluca, Castiglione Vincenzo, Ripoli Andrea, Panchetti Luca, Rossi Andrea, Giannoni Alberto, Startari Umberto, Aquaro Giovanni Donato, Emdin Michele, Piacenti Marcello
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM), it is uncertain which late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) pattern, extent and location predict ventricular arrhythmias.
METHODS: We analysed 183 NIDCM patients (73% men, median age 66 years) receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention, undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance within 1 month before implantation. The primary endpoint was appropriate ICD shock, the secondary endpoint was a composite of appropriate ICD shock and cardiac death.
RESULTS: LGE was found in 116 patients (63%), accounting for 9% of LV mass (5-13%). Over a 30-month follow-up (10-65), 20 patients (11%) experienced the primary and 30 patients (16%) the secondary endpoint. LGE presence, inferior wall LGE, diffuse (≥2 wall) LGE, the number of segments with LGE, the number of segments with 50-75% transmural LGE, and percent LGE mass were univariate predictors of both endpoints. Also septal LGE predicted the primary, and lateral LGE predicted the secondary endpoint. LGE limited to right ventricular insertion points did not predict any endpoint. Percent LGE mass had an area under the curve of 0.734 for the primary endpoint, with 13% as the best cut-off (55% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 32% PPV, 94% NPV), conferring a 7-fold higher risk compared to patients with no LGE or LGE <13%. Survival free from both endpoints was significantly worse for patients with LGE ≥13%.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NIDCM receiving a defibrillator for primary prevention, LGE presence and extent predicted appropriate ICD shock and cardiac mortality; also specific LGE patterns and locations predicted a worse prognosis.
METHODS: We analysed 183 NIDCM patients (73% men, median age 66 years) receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention, undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance within 1 month before implantation. The primary endpoint was appropriate ICD shock, the secondary endpoint was a composite of appropriate ICD shock and cardiac death.
RESULTS: LGE was found in 116 patients (63%), accounting for 9% of LV mass (5-13%). Over a 30-month follow-up (10-65), 20 patients (11%) experienced the primary and 30 patients (16%) the secondary endpoint. LGE presence, inferior wall LGE, diffuse (≥2 wall) LGE, the number of segments with LGE, the number of segments with 50-75% transmural LGE, and percent LGE mass were univariate predictors of both endpoints. Also septal LGE predicted the primary, and lateral LGE predicted the secondary endpoint. LGE limited to right ventricular insertion points did not predict any endpoint. Percent LGE mass had an area under the curve of 0.734 for the primary endpoint, with 13% as the best cut-off (55% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 32% PPV, 94% NPV), conferring a 7-fold higher risk compared to patients with no LGE or LGE <13%. Survival free from both endpoints was significantly worse for patients with LGE ≥13%.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NIDCM receiving a defibrillator for primary prevention, LGE presence and extent predicted appropriate ICD shock and cardiac mortality; also specific LGE patterns and locations predicted a worse prognosis.