Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025
Efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery for hypothalamic hamartomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hajikarimloo Bardia, Tos Salem M, Alvani Mohammadamin Sabbagh, Kooshki Alireza, Mohammadzadeh Ibrahim, Zare Amir Hesam, Zare Amir Hosein, Mortezaei Ali, Hezaveh Ehsan Bahrami, Ebrahimi Azin, Habibi Mohammad Amin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Hypothalamic hamartomas (HHs) are congenital, non-neoplastic tumors originating from the hypothalamic region. While surgical resection remains the standard treatment, it is associated with substantial morbidity, leading to the exploration of minimally invasive approaches such as radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC), laser interstitial thermal therapy (LiTT), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy and safety of SRS in managing HHs, with a focus on seizure control, endocrine function, and treatment-related complications.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on December 6, 2024, using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies that evaluated the role of SRS in HH patients were included. The R program was used to calculate the pooled estimates.
RESULTS: Seven studies with 152 HH patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled post-SRS seizure improvement rate of 77% (95% CI: 61%-91%) and a seizure-free status rate of 48% (95% CI: 19%-78%). In addition, the meta-analysis showed a pooled good outcome, Engel I/II, rate of 67% (95% CI: 48%-84%), and a pooled adverse radiation effect (ARE) rate of 0% (95% CI: 0%-1%).
CONCLUSION: SRS provides favorable seizure control and a promising safety profile for managing patients with HH.
CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on December 6, 2024, using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies that evaluated the role of SRS in HH patients were included. The R program was used to calculate the pooled estimates.
RESULTS: Seven studies with 152 HH patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled post-SRS seizure improvement rate of 77% (95% CI: 61%-91%) and a seizure-free status rate of 48% (95% CI: 19%-78%). In addition, the meta-analysis showed a pooled good outcome, Engel I/II, rate of 67% (95% CI: 48%-84%), and a pooled adverse radiation effect (ARE) rate of 0% (95% CI: 0%-1%).
CONCLUSION: SRS provides favorable seizure control and a promising safety profile for managing patients with HH.
CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.