MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1148/radiology.195.1.7892490

Медицинская библиотека · Radiology · 1995

Lymphocytic adenohypophysitis: contrast-enhanced MR imaging in five cases.

Ahmadi J, Meyers G S, Segall H D, Sharma O P, Hinton D R

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To describe observations of adenohypophysitis on magnetic resonance (MR) images.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Clinical, enhanced MR imaging, surgical, and histologic findings were retrospectively studied in four female patients and one male patient with adenohypophysitis who presented with headaches, pituitary insufficiency, or hyperprolactinemia. Results were compared with MR imaging, surgical, and pathologic findings in 128 consecutive cases of newly diagnosed pituitary adenomas.

RESULTS

In two of the four female patients, disease onset was not associated with a recent history of pregnancy. Imaging findings included a slightly lobulated, intensely enhancing pituitary mass (n = 5); enhancement along the infundibulum (n = 4); and adjacent dural enhancement (n = 4). Four patients had extrapituitary involvement. Some of these findings were noted in patients with pituitary adenomas complicated by infarction, hemorrhage, or necrosis.

CONCLUSION

The observed clinical and MR imaging findings are suggestive of adenohypophysitis; the latter, however, are not specific and may be seen in some complicated cases of pituitary adenoma and other rare forms of pituitary inflammation. Biopsy may be needed to establish the correct diagnosis if a trial of steroid therapy fails.

Для цитирования: Ahmadi J, Meyers G S, Segall H D, Sharma O P, Hinton D R. Lymphocytic adenohypophysitis: contrast-enhanced MR imaging in five cases.. Radiology. 1995. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.195.1.7892490.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.