MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/da.10094

Медицинская библиотека · Depression and anxiety · 2003

Problematic internet use: proposed classification and diagnostic criteria.

Shapira Nathan A, Lessig Mary C, Goldsmith Toby D, Szabo Steven T, Lazoritz Martin, Gold Mark S, Stein Dan J

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Since the mid-1990s, there have been frequent reports of individuals whose use of the computer and internet is problematic. Given the recent expansion and the expected increase in internet availability and usage in the coming years, it is important that healthcare professionals be informed about this behavior and its associated problems. Recently, psychological and psychiatric literature has described individuals that exhibit problematic internet use who often suffer from other psychiatric disorders. In the face of this comorbidity, it is essential to evaluate whether these individuals represent a distinct class of disorder, or a manifestation/coping mechanism related to other underlying diagnosis. In either event, problematic internet use negatively impacts social and emotional functioning. Based on the current limited empirical evidence, problematic internet use may best be classified as an impulse control disorder. It is therefore imperative that problematic internet use be appropriately identified among symptomatic individuals. For these reasons, we propose specific diagnostic criteria that will allow for consistent identification and assist in further study of this behavior.

Для цитирования: Shapira Nathan A, Lessig Mary C, Goldsmith Toby D, Szabo Steven T, Lazoritz Martin, Gold Mark S, Stein Dan J. Problematic internet use: proposed classification and diagnostic criteria.. Depression and anxiety. 2003. DOI: 10.1002/da.10094.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.