MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.01.024

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of ophthalmology · 2010

Intracameral voriconazole injection in the treatment of fungal endophthalmitis resulting from keratitis.

Shen Ying-Cheng, Wang Chun-Yuan, Tsai Hin-Yeung, Lee Hsin-Nung

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To report the therapeutic efficacy of intracameral voriconazole injection in the treatment of fungal endophthalmitis resulting from keratitis.

DESIGN

Retrospective, single-institution, consecutive case series.

METHODS

Microbiologic and medical records were reviewed for patients with positive intraocular culture results or proven pathologic features for fungal organisms and clinically diagnosed fungal endophthalmitis resulting from keratitis. Ten eyes were treated with an intracameral injection of 100 microg voriconazole. Clinical characteristics, treatment, and causative organisms were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fusarium and Aspergillus were the most common causative organisms. Voriconazole was injected intracamerally from 1 to 8 times. Of the 7 patients who received 5 or more repeat injections, 6 were caused by Fusarium and 1 by Acremonium. In the remaining 3 patients who were administered 4 or fewer voriconazole injections, the causative organisms were Aspergillus and Alternaria.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracameral voriconazole injection may be an effective treatment for fungal endophthalmitis contiguously spreading from keratitis.

Для цитирования: Shen Ying-Cheng, Wang Chun-Yuan, Tsai Hin-Yeung, Lee Hsin-Nung. Intracameral voriconazole injection in the treatment of fungal endophthalmitis resulting from keratitis.. American journal of ophthalmology. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.01.024.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.