JAMA ophthalmology · 2024
Biallelic Loss-of-Function Variants in UBAP1L and Nonsyndromic Retinal Dystrophies.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ullah Ehsan, Lin Siying, Lu Jiaxiong, Bender Chelsea, Webster Andrew R, Malka Samantha, Madhusudhan Savita, Rees Emma, Williams Denise, Agather Aime R, Cukras Catherine A, Hufnagel Robert B, Chen Rui, Huryn Laryssa A, Arno Gavin, Guan Bin
Аннотация
IMPORTANCE: Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) present a challenge in clinical diagnostics due to their pronounced genetic heterogeneity. Despite advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, a substantial portion of the genetic basis underlying IRDs remains elusive. Addressing this gap seems important for gaining insights into the genetic landscape of IRDs, which may help improve diagnosis and prognosis and develop targeted therapies in the future.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a clinical and molecular characterization of 6 patients with IRDs with biallelic disease-causing variants in a novel candidate IRD disease gene.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter case series study included 6 patients with IRDs from 4 tertiary hospitals (in the US: National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center; in the UK: Moorfields Eye Hospital, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Birmingham Women's and Children's).
EXPOSURES: Biallelic disease-causing variants in the novel candidate IRD disease gene, UBAP1L.
MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Participants underwent comprehensive clinical ophthalmic assessments to characterize the features of retinal dystrophy. Exome and genome sequencing revealed candidate variants in the UBAP1L gene; no other plausible disease variants in known IRD genes were identified. A minigene assay provided functional insights for a noncanonical splice variant, and a knockout mouse model was used for in vivo functional elucidation.
RESULTS: Four homozygous UBAP1L variants were identified in the affected individuals from 6 families, including 2 frameshift variants (c.710del and c.634_644del), 1 canonical splice variant (c.121-2A>C), and 1 noncanonical splice variant (c.910-7G>A), which was shown to cause aberrant splicing and frameshift in a minigene assay. Participants presented with retinal dystrophy including maculopathy, cone dystrophy, and cone-rod dystrophy. Single-cell RNA sequencing of the retina showed that human UBAP1L is highly expressed in both cones and retinal pigment epithelium, whereas mouse Ubap1l is highly expressed in cone cells only. Mice with truncation of the C-terminal SOUBA domain did not manifest retinal degeneration up to 15 months of age.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Study results reveal clinical and genetic evidence that loss of UBAP1L function was associated with inherited retinopathy in humans. These findings hold promise for improved clinical diagnostics, prognosis, and the potential development of targeted therapies for individuals affected by IRDs.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a clinical and molecular characterization of 6 patients with IRDs with biallelic disease-causing variants in a novel candidate IRD disease gene.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter case series study included 6 patients with IRDs from 4 tertiary hospitals (in the US: National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center; in the UK: Moorfields Eye Hospital, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Birmingham Women's and Children's).
EXPOSURES: Biallelic disease-causing variants in the novel candidate IRD disease gene, UBAP1L.
MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Participants underwent comprehensive clinical ophthalmic assessments to characterize the features of retinal dystrophy. Exome and genome sequencing revealed candidate variants in the UBAP1L gene; no other plausible disease variants in known IRD genes were identified. A minigene assay provided functional insights for a noncanonical splice variant, and a knockout mouse model was used for in vivo functional elucidation.
RESULTS: Four homozygous UBAP1L variants were identified in the affected individuals from 6 families, including 2 frameshift variants (c.710del and c.634_644del), 1 canonical splice variant (c.121-2A>C), and 1 noncanonical splice variant (c.910-7G>A), which was shown to cause aberrant splicing and frameshift in a minigene assay. Participants presented with retinal dystrophy including maculopathy, cone dystrophy, and cone-rod dystrophy. Single-cell RNA sequencing of the retina showed that human UBAP1L is highly expressed in both cones and retinal pigment epithelium, whereas mouse Ubap1l is highly expressed in cone cells only. Mice with truncation of the C-terminal SOUBA domain did not manifest retinal degeneration up to 15 months of age.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Study results reveal clinical and genetic evidence that loss of UBAP1L function was associated with inherited retinopathy in humans. These findings hold promise for improved clinical diagnostics, prognosis, and the potential development of targeted therapies for individuals affected by IRDs.