Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2018
Gal d 1-specific IgE predicts allergy to heated egg in Finnish children.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Palosuo Kati, Kukkonen Anna Kaarina, Pelkonen Anna Susanna, Mäkelä Mika Juhani
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Allergen-specific IgE levels can be useful in predicting outcomes of oral food challenges, but optimal cutoff levels vary in different populations. The aim was to determine cutoff values for egg white- and Gal d 1-, Gal d 2-, Gal d 3-, and Gal d 4-specific IgE (sIgE) predicting positive oral heated egg challenges in 185 Finnish children and adolescents.
METHODS: A total of 185 egg-sensitized patients (age: 1-19 years, median: 6.3, mean: 7.0 years) with suspected egg allergy underwent double-blind, placebo-controlled (n = 78), or open (n = 107) oral food challenges with heated egg white. Specific IgE levels to egg white, Gal d 1 (ovomucoid), Gal d 2 (ovalbumin), Gal d 3 (conalbumin), and Gal d 4 (lysozyme) were measured by ImmunoCAP and compared with challenge outcomes.
RESULTS: Of the 185 challenges, 124 (67%) were positive. Gal d 1 sIgE levels were significantly higher in the challenge-positive (median 13.5 kU/L, mean 33.2 kU/L) than in the challenge-negative group (median 0.2 kU/L, mean 1.2 kU/L), P < 0.0001. The diagnostic capacity of sIgE to egg white and Gal d 2, 3, and 4 was clearly weaker. In ROC analysis, the AUC for egg white was 0.86, Gal d 2 0.84, Gal d 3 0.79, and Gal d 4 0.77. Sensitization to Gal d 1 with a cutoff of value of >3.7 kU/L predicted a positive challenge with a specificity of 95% and sensitivity of 78%. The likelihood ratio was 15.9. In ROC analysis, the area under the curve was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91-0.97). With a cutoff value of >14 kU/L, all challenges were positive, and with a cutoff of <0.9 kU/L, 95% of the challenges were negative. In the children aged 1-5 years (n = 88), the cutoff for Gal d 1 was >3.8 kU/L, and in the children above 6 years of age (n = 97), it was >3.5 kU/L.
CONCLUSION: Gal d 1-specific IgE is useful in distinguishing egg-sensitized patients with clinically reactive egg allergy from those tolerant of heated egg. The optimal cutoff point in a Finnish population of 185 children and adolescents was 3.7 kU/L with no significant difference between the younger and older age groups.
METHODS: A total of 185 egg-sensitized patients (age: 1-19 years, median: 6.3, mean: 7.0 years) with suspected egg allergy underwent double-blind, placebo-controlled (n = 78), or open (n = 107) oral food challenges with heated egg white. Specific IgE levels to egg white, Gal d 1 (ovomucoid), Gal d 2 (ovalbumin), Gal d 3 (conalbumin), and Gal d 4 (lysozyme) were measured by ImmunoCAP and compared with challenge outcomes.
RESULTS: Of the 185 challenges, 124 (67%) were positive. Gal d 1 sIgE levels were significantly higher in the challenge-positive (median 13.5 kU/L, mean 33.2 kU/L) than in the challenge-negative group (median 0.2 kU/L, mean 1.2 kU/L), P < 0.0001. The diagnostic capacity of sIgE to egg white and Gal d 2, 3, and 4 was clearly weaker. In ROC analysis, the AUC for egg white was 0.86, Gal d 2 0.84, Gal d 3 0.79, and Gal d 4 0.77. Sensitization to Gal d 1 with a cutoff of value of >3.7 kU/L predicted a positive challenge with a specificity of 95% and sensitivity of 78%. The likelihood ratio was 15.9. In ROC analysis, the area under the curve was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91-0.97). With a cutoff value of >14 kU/L, all challenges were positive, and with a cutoff of <0.9 kU/L, 95% of the challenges were negative. In the children aged 1-5 years (n = 88), the cutoff for Gal d 1 was >3.8 kU/L, and in the children above 6 years of age (n = 97), it was >3.5 kU/L.
CONCLUSION: Gal d 1-specific IgE is useful in distinguishing egg-sensitized patients with clinically reactive egg allergy from those tolerant of heated egg. The optimal cutoff point in a Finnish population of 185 children and adolescents was 3.7 kU/L with no significant difference between the younger and older age groups.