Seizure · 2015
Temporal current-source of spikes suggests initial treatment failure in childhood absence epilepsy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yeom Jung Sook, Kim Young-Soo, Lee Jun Hwa, Jung Seokwon, Kwon Oh-Young
Аннотация
PURPOSE: In addition to the frontal lobe, the temporal lobe may also be involved in typical absence seizures. However, few studies have addressed the relationship between this involvement and drug responsiveness in childhood absence epilepsy (CAE). In this study, we observed the current-source distribution (CSD) of generalized spike-and-wave discharges (GSWDs) and investigated the relationship between temporal lobe involvement in the CSD and responsiveness to initial antiepileptic drug (AED) in CAE.
METHOD: Seventeen consecutive patients with CAE were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into an initial-response group and an initial-failure group, according to their responsiveness to the initial AED treatment. For each patient, the spike peak CSD of an averaged GSWD was obtained from the initial electroencephalogram. We compared the incidence of temporal involvement in the CSD between the two groups. We also compared clinical variables, including age of onset, gender, type and dose of first AED, time to cessation of clinical seizures, and seizure-free status.
RESULTS: The initial-response and initial-failure groups contained 12 and five patients, respectively. Temporal lobe involvement was more frequent (80% vs. 17%, p = 0.03), and time to cessation of clinical seizures was more prolonged (median 2.5 months vs. 8 months, p<0.01) in the initial-failure than in the initial-response group. None of the other variables studied differed between groups.
CONCLUSION: Initial AED failure was associated with temporal involvement in the CSD of CAE patients. This electrophysiological information may be helpful in clinical practice by estimating the efficacy of initial AED treatment in AED-naïve CAE patients in advance.
METHOD: Seventeen consecutive patients with CAE were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into an initial-response group and an initial-failure group, according to their responsiveness to the initial AED treatment. For each patient, the spike peak CSD of an averaged GSWD was obtained from the initial electroencephalogram. We compared the incidence of temporal involvement in the CSD between the two groups. We also compared clinical variables, including age of onset, gender, type and dose of first AED, time to cessation of clinical seizures, and seizure-free status.
RESULTS: The initial-response and initial-failure groups contained 12 and five patients, respectively. Temporal lobe involvement was more frequent (80% vs. 17%, p = 0.03), and time to cessation of clinical seizures was more prolonged (median 2.5 months vs. 8 months, p<0.01) in the initial-failure than in the initial-response group. None of the other variables studied differed between groups.
CONCLUSION: Initial AED failure was associated with temporal involvement in the CSD of CAE patients. This electrophysiological information may be helpful in clinical practice by estimating the efficacy of initial AED treatment in AED-naïve CAE patients in advance.