Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy · 2024
Outcome evaluation of pharmacist-physician collaborative protocol-based antimicrobial treatment for hospitalized stroke patients with aspiration pneumonia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yagi Yusuke, Yanagisawa Narika, Higuchi Shinya, Okazaki Moemi, Kawada Kei, Ishida Tomoaki, Jobu Kohei, Arakawa Yu, Kadota Tomohito, Kawanishi Yu, Fukuda Hitoshi, Ueba Tetsuya, Yamagishi Yuka, Hamada Yukihiro
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and patient outcomes of pharmacist-physician collaborative protocol-based antimicrobial treatment regimens for antimicrobial stewardship.
METHODS: Patients treated for aspiration pneumonia due to stroke within 48 h after admission to Kochi Medical School Hospital (January 2019 to December 2022) were included. Primary outcomes were the cumulative number of days of antimicrobial treatment and length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of patients under-dosed with first-choice antimicrobial agents and inpatient mortality.
RESULTS: Group A (66 patients) did not receive the antimicrobial treatment protocol, whereas group B (46 patients) did. There were no differences in the patient backgrounds. Group B had a significantly lower percentage of patients who were undertreated with the first-choice antimicrobial agent (9.1 % vs. 42.9 %). There was no significant difference in inpatient mortality between group A and group B (6.1 % vs. 4.3 %). The cumulative number of days of antimicrobial administration and the length of hospital stay were significantly lower in group B: 7.0 days (95 % CI, 6.0-8.0) vs. 9.0 days (95 % CI, 8.0-11.0) for antimicrobial administration, and 28.5 days (95 % CI, 22.0-35.0) vs. 43.0 days (95 % CI, 28.0-55.0) for hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: Protocol-based antimicrobial treatment for aspiration pneumonia supports appropriate antimicrobial usage and improves patient quality of life. These findings will assist in the effective treatment of aspiration pneumonia in an aging society.
METHODS: Patients treated for aspiration pneumonia due to stroke within 48 h after admission to Kochi Medical School Hospital (January 2019 to December 2022) were included. Primary outcomes were the cumulative number of days of antimicrobial treatment and length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of patients under-dosed with first-choice antimicrobial agents and inpatient mortality.
RESULTS: Group A (66 patients) did not receive the antimicrobial treatment protocol, whereas group B (46 patients) did. There were no differences in the patient backgrounds. Group B had a significantly lower percentage of patients who were undertreated with the first-choice antimicrobial agent (9.1 % vs. 42.9 %). There was no significant difference in inpatient mortality between group A and group B (6.1 % vs. 4.3 %). The cumulative number of days of antimicrobial administration and the length of hospital stay were significantly lower in group B: 7.0 days (95 % CI, 6.0-8.0) vs. 9.0 days (95 % CI, 8.0-11.0) for antimicrobial administration, and 28.5 days (95 % CI, 22.0-35.0) vs. 43.0 days (95 % CI, 28.0-55.0) for hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: Protocol-based antimicrobial treatment for aspiration pneumonia supports appropriate antimicrobial usage and improves patient quality of life. These findings will assist in the effective treatment of aspiration pneumonia in an aging society.