Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2005
Pulmonary regurgitation end-diastolic gradient is a Doppler marker of cardiac status: data from the Heart and Soul Study.
Контролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ristow Bryan, Ahmed Syed, Wang Lianyi, Liu Haiying, Angeja Brad G, Whooley Mary A, Schiller Nelson B
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Echocardiograms routinely sample pulmonary regurgitation signals from which it is possible to measure end diastolic gradients; these correlate with pulmonary artery diastolic pressures.
METHODS: We performed echocardiograms in 741 ambulatory adults with coronary artery disease who were recruited for the Heart and Soul Study. We compared indicators of cardiac status among individuals with normal (0-5.0 mm Hg) and elevated (> 5.0 mm Hg) end diastolic pulmonary regurgitation (EDPR) gradients.
RESULTS: Of the 481 participants with measurable EDPR gradients, 21% had elevated EDPR gradients (> 5.0 mm Hg). EDPR gradients > 5.0 mm Hg were associated with higher New York Heart Association functional class (P = .002), higher brain natriuretic peptide (P = .002), fewer metabolic equivalents achieved on treadmill testing (P < 0.001), and higher left ventricular mass (P < 0.001). The EDPR gradient > 5.0 mm Hg had a sensitivity of 25% (95% confidence interval 20-30%) and a specificity of 86% (80-91%) for detecting at least one of the following: systolic dysfunction, diastolic dysfunction, or abnormal wall motion score. The EDPR gradient > 5.0 mm HG was statistically equivalent to the tricuspid regurgitation (TR) gradient > 30 mm Hg in terms of diagnostic value (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve equaled 0.58 for each test). The EDPR gradient increased the yield of pulmonary artery pressures from 61% (TR gradient alone) to 84% (P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: The EDPR gradient provides valuable information independent of the TR gradient in evaluating pulmonary artery pressures and cardiac dysfunction.
METHODS: We performed echocardiograms in 741 ambulatory adults with coronary artery disease who were recruited for the Heart and Soul Study. We compared indicators of cardiac status among individuals with normal (0-5.0 mm Hg) and elevated (> 5.0 mm Hg) end diastolic pulmonary regurgitation (EDPR) gradients.
RESULTS: Of the 481 participants with measurable EDPR gradients, 21% had elevated EDPR gradients (> 5.0 mm Hg). EDPR gradients > 5.0 mm Hg were associated with higher New York Heart Association functional class (P = .002), higher brain natriuretic peptide (P = .002), fewer metabolic equivalents achieved on treadmill testing (P < 0.001), and higher left ventricular mass (P < 0.001). The EDPR gradient > 5.0 mm Hg had a sensitivity of 25% (95% confidence interval 20-30%) and a specificity of 86% (80-91%) for detecting at least one of the following: systolic dysfunction, diastolic dysfunction, or abnormal wall motion score. The EDPR gradient > 5.0 mm HG was statistically equivalent to the tricuspid regurgitation (TR) gradient > 30 mm Hg in terms of diagnostic value (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve equaled 0.58 for each test). The EDPR gradient increased the yield of pulmonary artery pressures from 61% (TR gradient alone) to 84% (P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: The EDPR gradient provides valuable information independent of the TR gradient in evaluating pulmonary artery pressures and cardiac dysfunction.