MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · No to shinkei = Brain and nerve · 2003

[Experience of cerebral angiography using gadolinium for renal insufficiency].

Hamasaki Osamu, Nakahara Toshinori, Katoh Yukio, Wakasa Tomochika, Sakoda Katsuaki

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Angiography by means of iodinated contrast material, before endovascular or surgical treatment, may result in serious complications in patients with renal insufficiency or previous anaphylactoid reaction to iodine. Alternative techniques, such as magnetic resonance angiography or carbon dioxide angiography, have their own limitations. We report effectiveness and safety of cerebral angiography using gadolinium for a patient with right vertebral artery and basilar artery occlusion and renal insufficiency. A 66-year-old woman with diabetes under medical treatment suffered loss of consciousness and left hemiparesis following dehydration for 24 hours. She was transferred to our hospital. Emergent MRI suggested brain stem and cerebellar infarction due to vertebral artery occlusion with diffusion-perfusion mismatch. Because of renal insufficiency, the digital subtraction cerebral angiography using gadolinium was performed. Appropriate diagnosis was achieved by angiography using gadolinium of 0.4 mmol/kg. There was no any complication including deterioration of renal function. Gadolinium appears to be a safe and useful intraarterial contrast agent in patients with renal insufficiency.

Для цитирования: Hamasaki Osamu, Nakahara Toshinori, Katoh Yukio, Wakasa Tomochika, Sakoda Katsuaki. [Experience of cerebral angiography using gadolinium for renal insufficiency].. No to shinkei = Brain and nerve. 2003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.