European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
Role of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the evaluation of peritoneal carcinomatosis and comparison with [18F]-FDG PET/CT.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhao Liang, Pang Yizhen, Luo Zuoming, Fu Kaili, Yang Tingting, Zhao Long, Sun Long, Wu Hua, Lin Qin, Chen Haojun
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the role of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), compared with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose [18F]-FDG PET/CT, for evaluating peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with various types of cancer.
METHODS: Patients with suspected peritoneal malignancy, who underwent both [18F]-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT between October 2019 and August 2020, were retrospectively analysed. The radiotracer uptake, peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score, and diagnostic performance of [18F]-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT were evaluated and compared.
RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 46 patients, including 16 patients with diffuse-type peritoneal carcinomatosis, 27 with nodular-type peritoneal carcinomatosis, and 3 true-negative patients. A significant difference in standard uptake values (SUV) of lesions between [18F]-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT examination was observed (median SUV: 3.48 vs. 9.82; P < 0.001), particularly in peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer (median SUV: 3.44 vs. 8.05; P = 0.001). Moreover, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT showed a higher PCI score and better sensitivity than [18F]-FDG PET/CT for the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis (6 vs. 18; P < 0.001; 72.09% vs. 97.67%; P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT demonstrated superior sensitivity over [18F]-FDG PET/CT for the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with various types of cancer, particularly gastric cancer. Furthermore, the uptake of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 in peritoneal carcinomatosis was significantly higher than that of [18F]-FDG, demonstrating a larger extent of the lesions and yielding a higher PCI score. This could help enhance the image contrast, improve physicians' diagnostic confidence, and reduce the proportion of missed diagnoses.
METHODS: Patients with suspected peritoneal malignancy, who underwent both [18F]-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT between October 2019 and August 2020, were retrospectively analysed. The radiotracer uptake, peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score, and diagnostic performance of [18F]-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT were evaluated and compared.
RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 46 patients, including 16 patients with diffuse-type peritoneal carcinomatosis, 27 with nodular-type peritoneal carcinomatosis, and 3 true-negative patients. A significant difference in standard uptake values (SUV) of lesions between [18F]-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT examination was observed (median SUV: 3.48 vs. 9.82; P < 0.001), particularly in peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer (median SUV: 3.44 vs. 8.05; P = 0.001). Moreover, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT showed a higher PCI score and better sensitivity than [18F]-FDG PET/CT for the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis (6 vs. 18; P < 0.001; 72.09% vs. 97.67%; P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT demonstrated superior sensitivity over [18F]-FDG PET/CT for the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with various types of cancer, particularly gastric cancer. Furthermore, the uptake of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 in peritoneal carcinomatosis was significantly higher than that of [18F]-FDG, demonstrating a larger extent of the lesions and yielding a higher PCI score. This could help enhance the image contrast, improve physicians' diagnostic confidence, and reduce the proportion of missed diagnoses.