Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
Trends and Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Insights From National Database.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ang Song Peng, Chia Jia Ee, Krittanawong Chayakrit, Piana Robert N, Lee Kwan, Ayoub Chadi, Pineda Jr Exequiel, Song David, Mukherjee Debabrata
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are associated with an increased cardiovascular risk including acute coronary syndrome. However, there is a lack of comprehensive data regarding the rate of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as well as the in-hospital characteristics and outcomes for MPN patients.
AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the temporal trends and outcomes of PCI among patients with MPN.
METHODS AND RESULTS: The National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2020 was queried to identify all PCI hospitalizations. Temporal trends and outcomes of patients with and without MPN following PCI were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented to compare outcomes between MPN and non-MPN groups. 2,237,210 PCI hospitalizations with 7560 (0.27%) patients with MPN were included in this study. Throughout the study period, the prevalence of MPN among PCI admissions remained stable (p-value for trend = 0.12). Within the MPN subgroup, essential thrombocythemia (ET) was the predominant condition (53.2). Patients with MPN had higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities than non-MPN patients. Following PSM, MPNs were significantly associated with a higher risk of blood transfusions (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.22-2.24, p = 0.001) and AKI (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.17-1.65, p < 0.001). In contrast, the risk of in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.83-1.69, p = 0.354 and bleeding (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.90-2.27, p = 0.127) did not significantly differ between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that while the prevalence of MPN among patients undergoing PCI remained stable, those with MPN faced higher risks of bleeding, blood transfusion and acute kidney injury. Further research is warranted to explore the underlying reasons for these increased risks and to improve outcomes in this high-risk group.
AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the temporal trends and outcomes of PCI among patients with MPN.
METHODS AND RESULTS: The National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2020 was queried to identify all PCI hospitalizations. Temporal trends and outcomes of patients with and without MPN following PCI were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented to compare outcomes between MPN and non-MPN groups. 2,237,210 PCI hospitalizations with 7560 (0.27%) patients with MPN were included in this study. Throughout the study period, the prevalence of MPN among PCI admissions remained stable (p-value for trend = 0.12). Within the MPN subgroup, essential thrombocythemia (ET) was the predominant condition (53.2). Patients with MPN had higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities than non-MPN patients. Following PSM, MPNs were significantly associated with a higher risk of blood transfusions (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.22-2.24, p = 0.001) and AKI (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.17-1.65, p < 0.001). In contrast, the risk of in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.83-1.69, p = 0.354 and bleeding (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.90-2.27, p = 0.127) did not significantly differ between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that while the prevalence of MPN among patients undergoing PCI remained stable, those with MPN faced higher risks of bleeding, blood transfusion and acute kidney injury. Further research is warranted to explore the underlying reasons for these increased risks and to improve outcomes in this high-risk group.