Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice · 2025
Awake bruxism and bullying among 8-10-year-old schoolchildren: A case-control study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Do Nascimento Bastos Carmem, Castilho Isabela Fernanda, Malta Marina Martelini, de Lima Gomes Stéfany, de Moraes Caroline Nogueira, Alves Carneiro Diego Patrik, Vedovello Silvia Amélia Scudeler, de Castro Meneghim Marcelo
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To explore the influence of bullying, self-esteem and sleep-disordered breathing on awake bruxism in a case-control study.
METHODS: This case-control study associated awake bruxism with bullying, self-esteem, and sleep-disordered breathing in 436 children. The cases (n = 218) had awake bruxism, while the controls (n = 218) were matched for age and sex. Data were collected through validated questionnaires and clinical examinations.
RESULTS: Logistic regression showed no significant associations between awake bruxism and race, family income, self-esteem, sleep-disordered breathing, or bullying (p > .05). Bullying was highly prevalent in both groups (81.2% vs. 78.4%), with similar odds ratios (OR = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.74-1.90).
CONCLUSION: These psychosocial and socioeconomic variables do not influence awake bruxism.
METHODS: This case-control study associated awake bruxism with bullying, self-esteem, and sleep-disordered breathing in 436 children. The cases (n = 218) had awake bruxism, while the controls (n = 218) were matched for age and sex. Data were collected through validated questionnaires and clinical examinations.
RESULTS: Logistic regression showed no significant associations between awake bruxism and race, family income, self-esteem, sleep-disordered breathing, or bullying (p > .05). Bullying was highly prevalent in both groups (81.2% vs. 78.4%), with similar odds ratios (OR = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.74-1.90).
CONCLUSION: These psychosocial and socioeconomic variables do not influence awake bruxism.