Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
Alice in Wonderland syndrome: a lesion mapping study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Piervincenzi Claudia, Petsas Nikolaos, Giannì Costanza, Di Piero Vittorio, Pantano Patrizia
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Alice in Wonderland syndrome (AIWS) is a rare neurological disorder, characterized by an erroneous perception of the body schema or surrounding space. It may be caused by a variety of neurological disorders, but to date, there is no agreement on which brain areas are affected. The aim of this study was to identify brain areas involved in AIWS.
METHODS: We conducted a literature search for AIWS cases following brain lesions. Patients were classified according to their symptoms as type A (somesthetic), type B (visual), or type C (somesthetic and visual). Using a lesion mapping approach, lesions were mapped onto a standard brain template and sites of overlap were identified.
RESULTS: Of 30 lesions, maximum spatial overlap was present in six cases. Local maxima were identified in the right occipital lobe, specifically in the extrastriate visual cortices and white matter tracts, including the ventral occipital fasciculus, optic tract, and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus. Overlap was primarily due to type B patients (the most prevalent type, n = 22), who shared an occipital site of brain damage. Type A (n = 5) and C patients (n = 3) were rarer, with lesions disparately located in the right hemisphere (thalamus, insula, frontal lobe, hippocampal/parahippocampal cortex).
CONCLUSIONS: Lesion-associated AIWS in type B patients could be related to brain damage in visual pathways located preferentially, but not exclusively, in the right hemisphere. Conversely, the lesion location disparity in cases with somesthetic symptoms suggests underlying structural/functional disconnections requiring further evaluation.
METHODS: We conducted a literature search for AIWS cases following brain lesions. Patients were classified according to their symptoms as type A (somesthetic), type B (visual), or type C (somesthetic and visual). Using a lesion mapping approach, lesions were mapped onto a standard brain template and sites of overlap were identified.
RESULTS: Of 30 lesions, maximum spatial overlap was present in six cases. Local maxima were identified in the right occipital lobe, specifically in the extrastriate visual cortices and white matter tracts, including the ventral occipital fasciculus, optic tract, and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus. Overlap was primarily due to type B patients (the most prevalent type, n = 22), who shared an occipital site of brain damage. Type A (n = 5) and C patients (n = 3) were rarer, with lesions disparately located in the right hemisphere (thalamus, insula, frontal lobe, hippocampal/parahippocampal cortex).
CONCLUSIONS: Lesion-associated AIWS in type B patients could be related to brain damage in visual pathways located preferentially, but not exclusively, in the right hemisphere. Conversely, the lesion location disparity in cases with somesthetic symptoms suggests underlying structural/functional disconnections requiring further evaluation.