Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging : the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye · 2004
Quantitative lacrimal scintigraphy after dacryocystorhinostomy.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zilelioglu Güler, Küçük Ozlem, Tekeli Oya, Günan Fatih, Aras Gülseren
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate lacrimal drainage in patients who have undergone successful dacryocystorhinostomy using quantitative dacryoscintigraphy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 72 eyes of 72 patients. There were 26 males and 46 females, with a mean age of 39.6 years (range, 8 to 67 years). The patients were subdivided into three groups. Group 1 consisted of 35 eyes with external dacryocystorhinostomy, group 2 consisted of 15 eyes with endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy, and group 3 consisted of 22 eyes with conjunctival dacryocystorhinostomy with a Jones tube. There was no epiphora in patients and the lacrimal drainage systems were patent by irrigation. The other normal eyes of the patients were evaluated as controls.
RESULTS: In groups 1 and 2, the mean T(1/2) values for the palpebral aperture were lower than those for normal eyes, and this difference was statistically significant (P < .01). In group 3, no significant difference was detected in the mean T(1/2) values for the palpebral aperture.
CONCLUSIONS: Tear flow was slower in patients who had had external and endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy, but conjunctival dacryocystorhinostomy did not affect T(1/2) values for the palpebral aperture.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 72 eyes of 72 patients. There were 26 males and 46 females, with a mean age of 39.6 years (range, 8 to 67 years). The patients were subdivided into three groups. Group 1 consisted of 35 eyes with external dacryocystorhinostomy, group 2 consisted of 15 eyes with endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy, and group 3 consisted of 22 eyes with conjunctival dacryocystorhinostomy with a Jones tube. There was no epiphora in patients and the lacrimal drainage systems were patent by irrigation. The other normal eyes of the patients were evaluated as controls.
RESULTS: In groups 1 and 2, the mean T(1/2) values for the palpebral aperture were lower than those for normal eyes, and this difference was statistically significant (P < .01). In group 3, no significant difference was detected in the mean T(1/2) values for the palpebral aperture.
CONCLUSIONS: Tear flow was slower in patients who had had external and endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy, but conjunctival dacryocystorhinostomy did not affect T(1/2) values for the palpebral aperture.