Radiology · 2010
Ocular adnexal lymphoma: diffusion-weighted mr imaging for differential diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Politi Letterio S, Forghani Reza, Godi Claudia, Resti Antonio G, Ponzoni Maurilio, Bianchi Stefania, Iadanza Antonella, Ambrosi Alessandro, Falini Andrea, Ferreri Andrés J M, Curtin Hugh D, Scotti Giuseppe
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To describe the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging features of ocular adnexal lymphomas (OALs), to determine the diagnostic accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for discriminating OALs from other orbital mass lesions, and to assess whether variations in ADC constitute a reliable biomarker of OAL response to therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional ethical committee approval and informed consent were obtained. In this prospective study, 114 white subjects (65 females and 49 males) were enrolled. Thirty-eight patients with histopathologically proved OAL underwent serial MR and DW imaging examination of the orbits. ADCs of OALs were compared with those of normal orbital structures, obtained in 18 healthy volunteers, and other orbital mass lesions, prospectively acquired in 58 patients (20 primary non-OAL neoplasms, 15 vascular benign lesions, 12 inflammatory lesions, 11 metastases). Interval change in ADC of OALs before and after treatment was analyzed in 29 patients. Analysis of covariance and a paired t test were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Baseline ADCs in OALs were lower than those in normal structures and other orbital diseases (P < .001). An ADC threshold of 775 x 10(-6) mm(2)/sec resulted in 96% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 88% positive predictive value, 98.2% negative predictive value, and 94.4% accuracy in OAL diagnosis. Following appropriate treatment, 10 (34%) of 29 patients showed OAL volumetric reduction, accompanied (n = 7) or preceded (n = 3) by an increase in ADC (P = .005). Conversely, a further reduction of ADC was observed in the seven patients who experienced disease progression (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: ADC permits accurate diagnosis of OALs. Interval change in ADC after therapy represents a helpful tool for predicting therapeutic response.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional ethical committee approval and informed consent were obtained. In this prospective study, 114 white subjects (65 females and 49 males) were enrolled. Thirty-eight patients with histopathologically proved OAL underwent serial MR and DW imaging examination of the orbits. ADCs of OALs were compared with those of normal orbital structures, obtained in 18 healthy volunteers, and other orbital mass lesions, prospectively acquired in 58 patients (20 primary non-OAL neoplasms, 15 vascular benign lesions, 12 inflammatory lesions, 11 metastases). Interval change in ADC of OALs before and after treatment was analyzed in 29 patients. Analysis of covariance and a paired t test were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Baseline ADCs in OALs were lower than those in normal structures and other orbital diseases (P < .001). An ADC threshold of 775 x 10(-6) mm(2)/sec resulted in 96% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 88% positive predictive value, 98.2% negative predictive value, and 94.4% accuracy in OAL diagnosis. Following appropriate treatment, 10 (34%) of 29 patients showed OAL volumetric reduction, accompanied (n = 7) or preceded (n = 3) by an increase in ADC (P = .005). Conversely, a further reduction of ADC was observed in the seven patients who experienced disease progression (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: ADC permits accurate diagnosis of OALs. Interval change in ADC after therapy represents a helpful tool for predicting therapeutic response.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDiagnosis, DifferentialDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMaleMiddle AgedOrbital NeoplasmsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult