Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2015
Clinical significance of induced left atrial macro-reentrant tachycardia after pulmonary vein isolation.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hara Hideyuki, Yoshinaga Masahiro, Matsui Yumie, Yamamoto Satoshi, Ishido Takahiro, Yutaka Kotaro, Kasuu Tomonori, Karakawa Masahiro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of induced left atrial macro-reentrant tachycardia (LA-AT) after encircling pulmonary vein isolation (EPVI) is unclear. Our objective was to determine whether induced LA-ATs are associated with the clinical recurrence of ATs.
METHODS: We studied 185 consecutive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who underwent their first EPVI with an 8-mm tip, nonirrigated catheter approach. AT was induced by atrial burst pacing after the completion of EPVI, and the atrial activation pattern was evaluated using EnSite NavX. Induced LA-ATs were ablated only in patients with clinical ATs of suspected LA origin. The factors associated with occurrence of AT after the procedure were examined.
RESULTS: LA-ATs were induced in 38 patients and ablated in 5 patients. During a follow-up of 23 ± 7 months, the occurrence of AT did not differ between patients with nonablated LA-ATs (4/33, 12 %) and those without any inducible ATs (16/113, 14 %, p > 0.99). In multivariate analysis, the number of ablation points for completing EPVI was the only independent predictor of AT occurrence (odds ratio 1.07, p < 0.01). A repeat procedure was performed in 22 of 26 patients who developed AT. Nineteen patients became free from AT and AF after ablation of the conduction gaps (EPVI, n = 17; another line, n = 4), extra PV firing (n = 4), focal AT (n = 4), and induced LA-ATs (n = 3).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients who had EPVI for PAF using an 8-mm tip, nonirrigated catheter, the occurrence of AT after EPVI was mainly due to conduction gaps in the ablation line or extra PV triggers. In patients with PAF, LA-ATs induced during the first procedure did not require ablation if they were not associated with clinical AT.
METHODS: We studied 185 consecutive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who underwent their first EPVI with an 8-mm tip, nonirrigated catheter approach. AT was induced by atrial burst pacing after the completion of EPVI, and the atrial activation pattern was evaluated using EnSite NavX. Induced LA-ATs were ablated only in patients with clinical ATs of suspected LA origin. The factors associated with occurrence of AT after the procedure were examined.
RESULTS: LA-ATs were induced in 38 patients and ablated in 5 patients. During a follow-up of 23 ± 7 months, the occurrence of AT did not differ between patients with nonablated LA-ATs (4/33, 12 %) and those without any inducible ATs (16/113, 14 %, p > 0.99). In multivariate analysis, the number of ablation points for completing EPVI was the only independent predictor of AT occurrence (odds ratio 1.07, p < 0.01). A repeat procedure was performed in 22 of 26 patients who developed AT. Nineteen patients became free from AT and AF after ablation of the conduction gaps (EPVI, n = 17; another line, n = 4), extra PV firing (n = 4), focal AT (n = 4), and induced LA-ATs (n = 3).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients who had EPVI for PAF using an 8-mm tip, nonirrigated catheter, the occurrence of AT after EPVI was mainly due to conduction gaps in the ablation line or extra PV triggers. In patients with PAF, LA-ATs induced during the first procedure did not require ablation if they were not associated with clinical AT.