Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 1997
Rehabilitation of young immigrants in primary care. A comparison between two treatment models.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Löfvander M, Engström A, Theander H, Furhoff A K
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect on well-being and sickness certification of interviews and three dialogue sessions concerning ideas about pain in young immigrants suffering from longstanding, benign pain.
DESIGN: A randomized clinical four-week trial between two treatment groups.
SETTING: A primary health care centre, Stockholm, Sweden.
SUBJECTS: 92 persons, 25-45 years of age, on sick leave > 6 weeks.
MEASURES: Physical and psychiatric examinations and self-ratings of work ability and pain anxiety were made before and after the programme. Sick leave data were studied at three and eight-month follow-ups.
RESULTS: 45 immigrants, mean age 38 years, mean sick leave 13 months, completed the programme. There were no significant differences in general or diagnostic data between the treatment groups. All had pain. Three-quarters reported pain anxiety. Nearly half had depressive disorders. Only ten persons had self-rated ability for part-time work. After the programme, there were significant differences in favour of the experimental group in number of participants with pain anxiety (p = 0.01), with diagnosed depression (p < 0.05), with self-rated work ability (p = 0.05), and in the number of participants who had returned to work at the eight-month follow-up (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that, for young immigrants suffering from long-standing benign pain, a structured dialogue with focus on concepts of pain may reduce pain anxiety and depressive mood, improve self-rated work ability, and increase the prospects of successful rehabilitation back to work.
DESIGN: A randomized clinical four-week trial between two treatment groups.
SETTING: A primary health care centre, Stockholm, Sweden.
SUBJECTS: 92 persons, 25-45 years of age, on sick leave > 6 weeks.
MEASURES: Physical and psychiatric examinations and self-ratings of work ability and pain anxiety were made before and after the programme. Sick leave data were studied at three and eight-month follow-ups.
RESULTS: 45 immigrants, mean age 38 years, mean sick leave 13 months, completed the programme. There were no significant differences in general or diagnostic data between the treatment groups. All had pain. Three-quarters reported pain anxiety. Nearly half had depressive disorders. Only ten persons had self-rated ability for part-time work. After the programme, there were significant differences in favour of the experimental group in number of participants with pain anxiety (p = 0.01), with diagnosed depression (p < 0.05), with self-rated work ability (p = 0.05), and in the number of participants who had returned to work at the eight-month follow-up (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that, for young immigrants suffering from long-standing benign pain, a structured dialogue with focus on concepts of pain may reduce pain anxiety and depressive mood, improve self-rated work ability, and increase the prospects of successful rehabilitation back to work.