Eye & contact lens · 2025
Comparison of the Corneal High-Order Aberration and Relative Corneal Refractive Power Distribution Induced by Different Orthokeratology Lenses Designs.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Riping, Zhou Youming, Ou Yunxuan, Chin Man Pan, Li Jinyu, Jhanji Vishal, Zhang Mingzhi
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study compared the myopia control effects of corneal high-order aberrations (CHOA) from two orthokeratology (OK) lenses based on their relative corneal refractive power shifts.
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 101 school children with low to moderate myopia were divided into three groups: group A (N=35) used 3-curve design lenses, group B (N=31) used 4-curve design lenses, and group C (N=35) wore regular spectacles. Cycloplegic refraction, visual acuity, and axial length (AL) were measured at baseline and after one year. Keratometry and CHOA were assessed before and after 3 months of lens wear. Relative corneal refractive power shifts and summed corneal power change (SCPC) were calculated. One-way ANOVA and planned comparison analyzed group differences.
RESULTS: Group B showed significantly slower AL elongation than group A ( P =0.017) after OK treatment. Group B's SCPC was significantly higher than group A's ( P ≤0.005). Group B had a significant increase in horizontal coma ( P =0.004). Increased SCPC led to more coma aberration with four-curve lens wear ( P <0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The four-curve lens design was more effective in slowing AL elongation for OK treatment. It also caused significantly higher horizontal coma aberration than the three-curve design.
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 101 school children with low to moderate myopia were divided into three groups: group A (N=35) used 3-curve design lenses, group B (N=31) used 4-curve design lenses, and group C (N=35) wore regular spectacles. Cycloplegic refraction, visual acuity, and axial length (AL) were measured at baseline and after one year. Keratometry and CHOA were assessed before and after 3 months of lens wear. Relative corneal refractive power shifts and summed corneal power change (SCPC) were calculated. One-way ANOVA and planned comparison analyzed group differences.
RESULTS: Group B showed significantly slower AL elongation than group A ( P =0.017) after OK treatment. Group B's SCPC was significantly higher than group A's ( P ≤0.005). Group B had a significant increase in horizontal coma ( P =0.004). Increased SCPC led to more coma aberration with four-curve lens wear ( P <0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The four-curve lens design was more effective in slowing AL elongation for OK treatment. It also caused significantly higher horizontal coma aberration than the three-curve design.