MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/09546634.2019.1610548

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of dermatological treatment · 2019

Clinical evaluation of an oral mucoadhesive film containing chitosan for the treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a randomized, double-blind study.

Shao Yanxiong, Zhou Haiwen

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of an oral mucoadhesive film containing chitosan for the treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS).

Methods

Seventy-two subjects with RAS were recruited to this randomized, parallel-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. The participants were randomly allocated to the test group or the control group. Demographic data were recorded at baseline. The use of the film was demonstrated. Pain score (visual analog scale), adverse effects, ulcer size were recorded on day 1 (baseline), day 2, day 4, and day 6.

Results

The reduction in ulcer size was significantly greater (p<.05) in the treatment group (2.91 ± 3.66) than in the control group (1.10 ± 2.26) between days 4 and 6. There was no significant difference between the treatment and control groups in the pain score, ulcer size, or reduction in the pain score (p>.05). No obvious adverse effects were observed.

Conclusions

The oral mucoadhesive film containing chitosan promotes oral ulcer healing and can be used as a drug carrier in treating oral ulcers.Trial registration number: ChiCTR-IOR-16008970.

Для цитирования: Shao Yanxiong, Zhou Haiwen. Clinical evaluation of an oral mucoadhesive film containing chitosan for the treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a randomized, double-blind study.. The Journal of dermatological treatment. 2019. DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1610548.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.