Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology · 2019
Botulinum toxin and occupational therapy for Writer's cramp.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Park Jung E, Shamim Ejaz A, Panyakaew Pattamon, Mathew Pawan, Toro Camilo, Sackett Jonathan, Karp Barbara, Lungu Codrin, Alter Katharine, Wu Tianxia, Ahmad Omar F, Villegas Monica, Auh Sungyoung, Hallett Mark
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Writer's cramp (WC) is a form of focal hand dystonia, for which focal botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections are the current best therapy. Past studies have shown that some types of rehabilitative therapy can be useful. We hypothesized that BoNT together with a specific type of occupational therapy would be better than BoNT alone for treating WC patients comparing the effects with a patient-rated subjective scale.
METHODS: Twelve WC patients were randomized to two groups. Six received only BoNT therapy and 6 received BoNT & occupational therapy. The occupational therapy involved specific exercises of finger movements in the direction opposite to the dystonic movements during writing. BoNT was injected by movement disorders neurologists in the affected muscles under electromyography-guidance. The primary outcome was the patient-rated subjective scale at 20 weeks. Secondary exploratory outcomes included the writer's cramp rating scale (WCRS), writer's cramp impairment scale (WCIS), the writer's cramp disability scale (WCDS), handgrip strength and kinetic parameters.
RESULTS: The patient-rated subjective scale scores at 20 weeks were not significantly different between the two groups. Significant objective improvement was noted in the BoNT & occupational therapy group, as noted by the decrease (28%) in WCIS scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Improvement of the primary outcome measure, the patient-rated subjective scale, was not achieved. However, significant improvement was found in the BoNT & occupational therapy group in a secondary measure of impairment. Our hypothesis-driven study results are likely limited by small sample size, and further large-scale studies of occupational therapy methods to improve the efficacy of BoNT seems worthwhile.
METHODS: Twelve WC patients were randomized to two groups. Six received only BoNT therapy and 6 received BoNT & occupational therapy. The occupational therapy involved specific exercises of finger movements in the direction opposite to the dystonic movements during writing. BoNT was injected by movement disorders neurologists in the affected muscles under electromyography-guidance. The primary outcome was the patient-rated subjective scale at 20 weeks. Secondary exploratory outcomes included the writer's cramp rating scale (WCRS), writer's cramp impairment scale (WCIS), the writer's cramp disability scale (WCDS), handgrip strength and kinetic parameters.
RESULTS: The patient-rated subjective scale scores at 20 weeks were not significantly different between the two groups. Significant objective improvement was noted in the BoNT & occupational therapy group, as noted by the decrease (28%) in WCIS scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Improvement of the primary outcome measure, the patient-rated subjective scale, was not achieved. However, significant improvement was found in the BoNT & occupational therapy group in a secondary measure of impairment. Our hypothesis-driven study results are likely limited by small sample size, and further large-scale studies of occupational therapy methods to improve the efficacy of BoNT seems worthwhile.