Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026
Measuring diet intake in adolescents: Relative validation of an artificial intelligence enhanced, image assisted mobile application.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moyen Audrey, Rossi Antonio, Hart Maurya, Simons Elinor, Mandhane Piushkumar J, Moraes Theo J, Azad Meghan B, Turvey Stuart E, Subbarao Padmaja, Tessier Anne-Julie, Miliku Kozeta
Аннотация
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Puberty is a critical period of development during which nutritional exposures are known to shape long-term health and the risk of chronic diseases. Current dietary assessment methods have limitations for use in large cohorts of adolescent populations. We aimed to evaluate the relative validity of Keenoa (not an acronym), an artificial intelligence-enhanced image-assisted mobile application, against the validated Automated Self-Administered 24 h recall (ASA24)-Canada web-based platform, among adolescents in the CHILD Cohort Study.
METHODS: Using a randomized crossover design, participants aged 11-15 years old completed three days (two weekdays and one weekend day) of both Keenoa food tracking and ASA24 food recalls. Differences in reported intakes were analyzed using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank test and deattenuated correlations by Spearman's coefficient. Agreement and bias were determined using Bland-Altman's test, and inter-quartile cross-classification agreement was assessed using weighted Cohen kappa.
RESULTS: This study included 141 participants with a mean age of 12.2 ± 0.8 years; of them 74 (52.5 %) males; and 88 (62.4 %) identified as Caucasian/White. Mean ± SD reported energy intakes (kcal/d) were 1976 ± 451 and 1978 ± 425, with ASA24 and Keenoa, respectively (P = 0.95). Mean reported macronutrient, iron, and potassium intakes did not significantly differ between tools. Reported fiber intake was higher, while sodium, calcium and vitamin D intakes were lower with Keenoa compared to ASA24 (P values < 0.001-0.025). Deattenuated correlations between tools ranged from r = 0.77 to 1.00 (all p< 0.01) and weighted Cohen κ scores ranged from 0.22 to 0.42 (all p < 0.001). Among all participants, 121 (85.8 %) and 78 (55.3 %) completed all 3 requested days with Keenoa and ASA24, respectively (P< 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The artificial intelligence-enhanced image-assisted Keenoa mobile application showed strong to moderate relative validity against ASA24 for energy, macronutrient, potassium and iron intakes. Vitamin D, calcium, fiber and sodium showed limited relative agreement based on mean differences. This novel tool may facilitate dietary assessment and reduce attrition bias in cohort studies. Future validation using objective biomarker measures will help establish true validity.
METHODS: Using a randomized crossover design, participants aged 11-15 years old completed three days (two weekdays and one weekend day) of both Keenoa food tracking and ASA24 food recalls. Differences in reported intakes were analyzed using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank test and deattenuated correlations by Spearman's coefficient. Agreement and bias were determined using Bland-Altman's test, and inter-quartile cross-classification agreement was assessed using weighted Cohen kappa.
RESULTS: This study included 141 participants with a mean age of 12.2 ± 0.8 years; of them 74 (52.5 %) males; and 88 (62.4 %) identified as Caucasian/White. Mean ± SD reported energy intakes (kcal/d) were 1976 ± 451 and 1978 ± 425, with ASA24 and Keenoa, respectively (P = 0.95). Mean reported macronutrient, iron, and potassium intakes did not significantly differ between tools. Reported fiber intake was higher, while sodium, calcium and vitamin D intakes were lower with Keenoa compared to ASA24 (P values < 0.001-0.025). Deattenuated correlations between tools ranged from r = 0.77 to 1.00 (all p< 0.01) and weighted Cohen κ scores ranged from 0.22 to 0.42 (all p < 0.001). Among all participants, 121 (85.8 %) and 78 (55.3 %) completed all 3 requested days with Keenoa and ASA24, respectively (P< 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The artificial intelligence-enhanced image-assisted Keenoa mobile application showed strong to moderate relative validity against ASA24 for energy, macronutrient, potassium and iron intakes. Vitamin D, calcium, fiber and sodium showed limited relative agreement based on mean differences. This novel tool may facilitate dietary assessment and reduce attrition bias in cohort studies. Future validation using objective biomarker measures will help establish true validity.