BMC ophthalmology · 2025
Outcomes of perfluorocarbon liquid vs. posterior retinotomy as adjuncts during pars-plana vitrectomy for the surgical repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a randomized clinical trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mohamed Elsayed Saad Ehab, Elbadry Mohammed Mohammed Hazem, Mohamed-Aly Ibrahim Mohamed, Hassan Salama Selim Omar, Mostafa Elsayed Abdelhafeez Sayed, Mohammed Sakr Ahmed, Mohamed Abo Elftouh Elsalhy Fathy, Abdelmohsen Ali Ayoub Ahmed, Abdelsamea Alazab Ehab, Tharwat Ehab, Gamal El Sayed Mostafa Tamer
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is a sight-threatening condition requiring prompt surgical intervention. Various adjunctive techniques are employed to enhance subretinal fluid drainage and retinal reattachment. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) versus posterior retinotomy (PR) during pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for RRD, focusing on anatomical success, visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and complications.
METHODS: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial that included 58 eyes with RRD, divided into Group A (PFCL, n = 29) and Group B (PR, n = 29). Preoperative assessments included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), IOP, axial length, lens status, macula status, and PVR grade. Outcomes were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months postoperatively. Primary outcomes included retinal reattachment rates and the number of operations; secondary outcomes included BCVA, IOP changes, complications like cataract development, retinal redetachment, epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation, and single-surgery success.
RESULTS: Retinal reattachment rates were comparable (76% in Group A vs. 66% in Group B, p = 0.387), as well as the number of operations (p = 0.375). Moreover, BCVA improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.05), with no intergroup differences. IOP increased postoperatively in both groups (p < 0.001), with no significant differences. No differences were observed in cataract formation or retinal redetachment. However, ERM incidence was significantly higher in the PR group (27% vs. 11%, p = 0.049).
CONCLUSION: PFCL and PR are effective for RRD repair, with similar anatomical and visual outcomes. However, PFCL may reduce ERM risk, making it preferable in certain cases. These findings guide surgical decision-making and highlight the need for further research.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06919211) on April 4, 2025.
METHODS: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial that included 58 eyes with RRD, divided into Group A (PFCL, n = 29) and Group B (PR, n = 29). Preoperative assessments included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), IOP, axial length, lens status, macula status, and PVR grade. Outcomes were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months postoperatively. Primary outcomes included retinal reattachment rates and the number of operations; secondary outcomes included BCVA, IOP changes, complications like cataract development, retinal redetachment, epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation, and single-surgery success.
RESULTS: Retinal reattachment rates were comparable (76% in Group A vs. 66% in Group B, p = 0.387), as well as the number of operations (p = 0.375). Moreover, BCVA improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.05), with no intergroup differences. IOP increased postoperatively in both groups (p < 0.001), with no significant differences. No differences were observed in cataract formation or retinal redetachment. However, ERM incidence was significantly higher in the PR group (27% vs. 11%, p = 0.049).
CONCLUSION: PFCL and PR are effective for RRD repair, with similar anatomical and visual outcomes. However, PFCL may reduce ERM risk, making it preferable in certain cases. These findings guide surgical decision-making and highlight the need for further research.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06919211) on April 4, 2025.