Cornea · 2009
Efficacy of besifloxacin in a rabbit model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus keratitis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sanders Melissa E, Norcross Erin W, Moore Quincy C, Shafiee Afshin, Marquart Mary E
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of topically applied besifloxacin (0.6%), gatifloxacin (0.3%), and moxifloxacin (0.5%) for the late treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) keratitis.
METHODS: One hundred colony-forming units (CFUs) of bacteria were injected intrastromally into rabbit corneas. Sixteen hours after infection, one topical drop of phosphate-buffered saline, besifloxacin, gatifloxacin, or moxifloxacin was applied to each eye every 15 minutes for 5 doses and then every 30 minutes for 14 doses. Eyes were examined before and after treatment by slit lamp biomicroscopy. Corneas were harvested from treated and untreated rabbits for the quantitation of bacteria. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined in vitro for each fluoroquinolone.
RESULTS: None of the treatments had an effect on clinical severity (P > 0.05). Although there were no differences in clinical severity between any groups after treatment, the mean log10 CFU of MRSA recovered from besifloxacin-treated corneas (5.111 +/- 0.251) was significantly lower than the CFU recovered from corneas treated with phosphate-buffered saline (7.006 +/- 0.144), gatifloxacin (7.108 +/- 0.346), and moxifloxacin (7.473 +/- 0.144; P < 0.001). CFU recovered from gatifloxacin- and moxifloxacin-treated corneas were not significantly different from phosphate-buffered saline-treated corneas (P = 1.000). The MICs against the MRSA strain were 8 microg/mL for both gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin, whereas the MIC for besifloxacin was 1 microg/mL.
CONCLUSION: Besifloxacin had an 8-fold lower MIC for MRSA than gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin and was significantly more effective than gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin in reducing the number of MRSA in the rabbit cornea 16 hours after infection.
METHODS: One hundred colony-forming units (CFUs) of bacteria were injected intrastromally into rabbit corneas. Sixteen hours after infection, one topical drop of phosphate-buffered saline, besifloxacin, gatifloxacin, or moxifloxacin was applied to each eye every 15 minutes for 5 doses and then every 30 minutes for 14 doses. Eyes were examined before and after treatment by slit lamp biomicroscopy. Corneas were harvested from treated and untreated rabbits for the quantitation of bacteria. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined in vitro for each fluoroquinolone.
RESULTS: None of the treatments had an effect on clinical severity (P > 0.05). Although there were no differences in clinical severity between any groups after treatment, the mean log10 CFU of MRSA recovered from besifloxacin-treated corneas (5.111 +/- 0.251) was significantly lower than the CFU recovered from corneas treated with phosphate-buffered saline (7.006 +/- 0.144), gatifloxacin (7.108 +/- 0.346), and moxifloxacin (7.473 +/- 0.144; P < 0.001). CFU recovered from gatifloxacin- and moxifloxacin-treated corneas were not significantly different from phosphate-buffered saline-treated corneas (P = 1.000). The MICs against the MRSA strain were 8 microg/mL for both gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin, whereas the MIC for besifloxacin was 1 microg/mL.
CONCLUSION: Besifloxacin had an 8-fold lower MIC for MRSA than gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin and was significantly more effective than gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin in reducing the number of MRSA in the rabbit cornea 16 hours after infection.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Administration, TopicalAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAza CompoundsAzepinesColony Count, MicrobialCorneal UlcerDisease Models, AnimalEye Infections, BacterialFemaleFluoroquinolonesGatifloxacinMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMoxifloxacinOphthalmic SolutionsQuinolinesRabbitsStaphylococcal InfectionsTreatment Outcome