DOI 10.1097/ico.0b013e318142bff3
Fungal keratitis in London: microbiological and clinical evaluation.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To review cases of culture-positive fungal keratitis seen at Moorfields Eye Hospital over a 13-year period to January 2007.
METHODS
Isolates were identified retrospectively from laboratory reports. The clinical records were reviewed. The fungal type, risk factors for infection, in vitro sensitivity, and clinical outcome were recorded.
RESULTS
There were 66 isolates from 65 patients (men, 53.8%). Forty (60.6%) of the isolates were subspecies of Candida. The average interval from the onset of keratitis to confirmation of fungal infection was 3.4 weeks (median, 1.0 week; range, 0-16 weeks). Prior ocular surface disease (OSD) or a penetrating keratoplasty (PK) was present in 38 (97.4%) patients with Candida infection, and 29 (74.4%) patients with Candida infection were using topical steroid at the time of diagnosis. The principal risk factors for filamentary fungal infection were trauma (8 cases, 30.8%) or cosmetic contact lens wear (8 cases, 30.8%), with OSD or a prior PK each present in 5 (19.2%) cases. The difference in the proportions of risk factors between the 2 fungal groups was statistically significant (P < 0.000). The visual outcome was similar between groups, and at final review, 27 (41.5%) eyes had a visual acuity of < or = 1/60 and 3 (4.6%) eyes were eviscerated. In vitro sensitivity testing showed full or part sensitivity in 100% of 55 isolates tested against econazole, 87.9% of 58 isolates tested against amphotericin, 75% of 40 isolates tested against itraconazole, and 100% of 20 isolates tested against voriconazole.
CONCLUSIONS
Candida was the principal isolate, usually from eyes with OSD or a prior PK treated with topical steroids.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.