Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2024
Comparison of Risk Factors Between Lean and Nonlean Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: A Multicenter Study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sun Weixia, Lv Yingqi, Wang Li, Yu Hekai, Yi He, Wang Yifan, Han Jing, Liu Yingzhao, Miao Congqing, Li Jie, Zhang Yan, Wang Mengying, Chen Lei, Pandol Stephen J, Li Ling
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: A multicenter study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was performed to assess the differences of liver steatosis and fibrosis between lean and nonlean individuals.
METHODS: Patients with T2DM from 16 centers were recruited and underwent transient elastography examination for diagnosis of liver steatosis and fibrosis. Clinical information, such as diabetes status, serum lipids profiles, and inflammatory markers, were collected. Potential risk factors of liver steatosis and fibrosis in lean (body mass index [BMI] < 23 kg/m2) and nonlean (BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2) groups were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 1762 patients were included. The prevalence of liver steatosis and fibrosis in the lean group was 44.7% and 23.4%, respectively. The prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular disease was higher in lean patients when compared with nonlean group. Lean patients with liver steatosis or fibrosis were older, had longer diabetes duration, lower levels of homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance and serum lipids. The BMI, visceral fat area, and triglyceride were among the most significant correlators of liver steatosis for both nonlean and lean patients. However, lipid profiles were different between the two groups. Besides, insulin resistance, BMI, and lipid levels were not observed to be associated with fibrosis in the lean group.
CONCLUSION: In lean patients with T2DM, liver steatosis and fibrosis were less associated with insulin resistance. Risk factors of liver steatosis were different between lean and nonlean patients, indicating the necessity of risk stratification and tailored management strategies.
METHODS: Patients with T2DM from 16 centers were recruited and underwent transient elastography examination for diagnosis of liver steatosis and fibrosis. Clinical information, such as diabetes status, serum lipids profiles, and inflammatory markers, were collected. Potential risk factors of liver steatosis and fibrosis in lean (body mass index [BMI] < 23 kg/m2) and nonlean (BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2) groups were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 1762 patients were included. The prevalence of liver steatosis and fibrosis in the lean group was 44.7% and 23.4%, respectively. The prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular disease was higher in lean patients when compared with nonlean group. Lean patients with liver steatosis or fibrosis were older, had longer diabetes duration, lower levels of homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance and serum lipids. The BMI, visceral fat area, and triglyceride were among the most significant correlators of liver steatosis for both nonlean and lean patients. However, lipid profiles were different between the two groups. Besides, insulin resistance, BMI, and lipid levels were not observed to be associated with fibrosis in the lean group.
CONCLUSION: In lean patients with T2DM, liver steatosis and fibrosis were less associated with insulin resistance. Risk factors of liver steatosis were different between lean and nonlean patients, indicating the necessity of risk stratification and tailored management strategies.