Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2013
Psychopathology in children and adolescents with primary headaches: categorical and dimensional approaches.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Margari Francesco, Lucarelli Elisabetta, Craig Francesco, Petruzzelli Maria G, Lecce Paola A, Margari Lucia
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Recurrent headache is common in childhood, but there is not a great amount of data on the associations between headaches and psychopathology in children.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine the relationships between primary headaches and psychopathology in children, using both the categorical and dimensional assessment.
METHODS: The sample consisted of 70 patients with primary headache compared to a matched sample of 50 healthy children. Psychiatric comorbidity was defined according to the diagnostic criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Disorders. Child psychopathology outcomes were assessed using child- and parent-reported standardized instruments.
RESULTS: Internalizing and externalizing problems were significantly represented among children with headaches compared to the control group, respectively 63% and 27%, without significant differences between migraine and tension-type headache children. Moreover, a total of 26% of the children with a headache reported psychiatric comorbidity such as anxiety and mood disorders.
CONCLUSION: The dimensional approach improves accuracy in the recognition of emotional and behavioral problems compared to the categorical approach; however, the use of both of these approaches could be useful for clinical practice, treatment and research.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine the relationships between primary headaches and psychopathology in children, using both the categorical and dimensional assessment.
METHODS: The sample consisted of 70 patients with primary headache compared to a matched sample of 50 healthy children. Psychiatric comorbidity was defined according to the diagnostic criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Disorders. Child psychopathology outcomes were assessed using child- and parent-reported standardized instruments.
RESULTS: Internalizing and externalizing problems were significantly represented among children with headaches compared to the control group, respectively 63% and 27%, without significant differences between migraine and tension-type headache children. Moreover, a total of 26% of the children with a headache reported psychiatric comorbidity such as anxiety and mood disorders.
CONCLUSION: The dimensional approach improves accuracy in the recognition of emotional and behavioral problems compared to the categorical approach; however, the use of both of these approaches could be useful for clinical practice, treatment and research.