MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/ijph.ijph_356_24

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of public health · 2025

Comparison of Different Body Mass Index Classification Tools to Identify Underweight and Overweight among Young Girls in Rural Haryana.

Srinath K, Kaur Ravneet, Kalaivani Mani, Kant Shashi, Misra Puneet, Gupta Sanjeev Kumar

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Malnutrition is prevalent and impactful among young Indian girls aged under 18 years. Systematic errors have been observed in body mass index (BMI) classification among these girls. We assessed anthropometry of 185 young girls (15-17 years) from rural Haryana, and classified BMI using different tools by the World Health Organization (WHO), Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Indian Academy of Pediatrics (IAP), and extended International Obesity Task Force (IOTF). Agreement between various tools with extended IOTF cutoffs was expressed by Cohen's weighted kappa. The WHO and IAP charts demonstrated moderate agreement with extended IOTF cutoffs. The CDC chart did not distinguish severe underweight and underweight. Extended IOTF Asian cutoffs are context-specific, able to classify all five weight categories, have smooth transition to adult BMI standards, and suitable for identifying underweight and overweight. This study emphasizes need for developing and using accurate BMI classification tools, to improve the efficiency of addressing malnutrition among young rural Indian girls.

Для цитирования: Srinath K, Kaur Ravneet, Kalaivani Mani, Kant Shashi, Misra Puneet, Gupta Sanjeev Kumar. Comparison of Different Body Mass Index Classification Tools to Identify Underweight and Overweight among Young Girls in Rural Haryana.. Indian journal of public health. 2025. DOI: 10.4103/ijph.ijph_356_24.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.