High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
Lipoprotein(a) in Essential Hypertension: Associations with Blood Pressure and Hypertension-Mediated Organ Damage.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nardoianni Giulia, Tocci Giuliano, Pala Barbara, Russo Marco, Dutti Giovanni Marco, Fogacci Federica, Cicero Arrigo F G, Volpe Massimo, Barbato Emanuele
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Although recommended for cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification in adults, the role of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in hypertension is not fully established.
AIM: To evaluate Lp(a) levels in adult outpatients with essential arterial hypertension.
METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was conducted in outpatients of both sexes, aged ≥ 18 years, with treated or untreated essential hypertension, who were consecutively evaluated at the Hypertension Unit, Excellence Hypertension Center, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy. Participants underwent office and out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurements, as well as assessment of hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD). BP measurements were performed, and hypertension phenotypes were classified according to 2023 European hypertension guidelines. Lp(a) levels were measured, and the study population was stratified according to a Lp(a) cut-off value of ≥50 mg/dl. Due to the non-uniform distribution, absolute Lp(a) values were logarithmically transformed.
RESULTS: A total of 230 patients with available Lp(a) values were included (42.6% women, mean age 66.3 ± 11.5 years, BMI 27.1 ± 4.5 kg/m2, office BP 137.1 ± 18.1/83.7 ± 11.0 mmHg, 24-hour BP 129.8 ± 14.5/79.6 ± 9.8 mmHg, Lp(a) 51.4 ± 65.3 mg/dL), among whom 32.2% had Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dl. There were significantly higher proportions of men (74.3% vs. 49.4%; P < 0.001), dyslipidaemia (97.3% vs. 75.0%; P < 0.001) and comorbidities (55.4% vs. 30.8%; P < 0.001) in patients with high Lp(a) than in those with normal Lp(a), who also received more frequently lipid lowering therapies (P < 0.001) and aspirin (P = 0.003). However, lower office systolic BP values (133.5±18.8 vs. 138.8±17.6 mmHg: P = 0.036) were observed in patients with Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL than in those with < 50 mg/dl. Also, no significant differences for Lp(a) levels were observed among various hypertension phenotypes, as defined by office (P = 0.156) or out-of-office BP values (P = 0.065). No significant correlations were found between Lp(a) and office or out-of-office BP levels, both in treated and untreated hypertensive outpatients.
CONCLUSIONS: In our population, Lp(a) levels were not associated with either office or out-of-office BP values, irrespective of antihypertensive treatment status. The role of Lp(a) in hypertension warrants further investigation.
AIM: To evaluate Lp(a) levels in adult outpatients with essential arterial hypertension.
METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was conducted in outpatients of both sexes, aged ≥ 18 years, with treated or untreated essential hypertension, who were consecutively evaluated at the Hypertension Unit, Excellence Hypertension Center, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy. Participants underwent office and out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurements, as well as assessment of hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD). BP measurements were performed, and hypertension phenotypes were classified according to 2023 European hypertension guidelines. Lp(a) levels were measured, and the study population was stratified according to a Lp(a) cut-off value of ≥50 mg/dl. Due to the non-uniform distribution, absolute Lp(a) values were logarithmically transformed.
RESULTS: A total of 230 patients with available Lp(a) values were included (42.6% women, mean age 66.3 ± 11.5 years, BMI 27.1 ± 4.5 kg/m2, office BP 137.1 ± 18.1/83.7 ± 11.0 mmHg, 24-hour BP 129.8 ± 14.5/79.6 ± 9.8 mmHg, Lp(a) 51.4 ± 65.3 mg/dL), among whom 32.2% had Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dl. There were significantly higher proportions of men (74.3% vs. 49.4%; P < 0.001), dyslipidaemia (97.3% vs. 75.0%; P < 0.001) and comorbidities (55.4% vs. 30.8%; P < 0.001) in patients with high Lp(a) than in those with normal Lp(a), who also received more frequently lipid lowering therapies (P < 0.001) and aspirin (P = 0.003). However, lower office systolic BP values (133.5±18.8 vs. 138.8±17.6 mmHg: P = 0.036) were observed in patients with Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL than in those with < 50 mg/dl. Also, no significant differences for Lp(a) levels were observed among various hypertension phenotypes, as defined by office (P = 0.156) or out-of-office BP values (P = 0.065). No significant correlations were found between Lp(a) and office or out-of-office BP levels, both in treated and untreated hypertensive outpatients.
CONCLUSIONS: In our population, Lp(a) levels were not associated with either office or out-of-office BP values, irrespective of antihypertensive treatment status. The role of Lp(a) in hypertension warrants further investigation.