Heart rhythm · 2024
Is electrical cardioversion independently associated with infarcts on brain magnetic resonance imaging or clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation?
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stauber Annina, Müller Andreas, Rommers Nikki, Aeschbacher Stefanie, Bonati Leo H, Conen David, Reichlin Tobias, Ammann Peter, Rodondi Nicolas, DiValentino Marcello, Moschovitis Giorgio, Aebersold Helena, Beer Jürg Hans, Sinnecker Tim, Jeger Raban V, Kurz David J, Liedtke Claudia, Kühne Michael, Osswald Stefan, Bernheim Alain M, Swiss-AF investigators
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Electrical cardioversion (ECV) is frequently performed in symptomatic atrial fibrillation.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the association of ECV with infarcts on brain magnetic resonance imaging (bMRI) and clinical outcomes.
METHODS: The Swiss Atrial Fibrillation Cohort Study included 2386 patients; 1731 patients were evaluated by bMRI. ECVs were recorded by questionnaire. Patients were assigned to categories by number of ECVs performed before enrollment (0, 1, ≥2). A bMRI study was conducted at baseline and after 2 years (n = 1227) and analyzed for large noncortical or cortical infarcts and small noncortical infarcts. Clinical outcomes were recorded during follow-up. Associations of ECV and outcome measures were assessed by multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: There was no independent association between the number of ECVs and infarct prevalence (large noncortical or cortical infarcts and small noncortical infarcts) on baseline bMRI (ECV 1 vs 0: odds ratio [OR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.68-1.24]; ECV ≥2 vs 0: OR, 1.04 [0.72-1.44]) or between ECVs performed during follow-up and new infarcts on bMRI at 2 years (OR, 1.46 [0.54-3.31]). ECVs were not associated with overt stroke or transient ischemic attack (ECV 1 vs 0: hazard ratio [HR], 1.36 [0.88-2.10]; ECV ≥2 vs 0: HR, 1.53 [0.94-2.48]), hospitalization for heart failure (ECV 1 vs 0: HR, 1.06 [0.82-1.37]; ECV ≥2 vs 0: HR, 1.03 [0.77-1.38]), or death (ECV 1 vs 0: HR, 0.90 [0.70-1.15]; ECV ≥2 vs 0: HR, 0.91 [0.69-1.20]).
CONCLUSION: There was no association between ECV performed before enrollment and cerebral infarcts on baseline bMRI or between ECV performed during follow-up and new infarcts at 2 years. Moreover, ECV was not associated with clinical events.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the association of ECV with infarcts on brain magnetic resonance imaging (bMRI) and clinical outcomes.
METHODS: The Swiss Atrial Fibrillation Cohort Study included 2386 patients; 1731 patients were evaluated by bMRI. ECVs were recorded by questionnaire. Patients were assigned to categories by number of ECVs performed before enrollment (0, 1, ≥2). A bMRI study was conducted at baseline and after 2 years (n = 1227) and analyzed for large noncortical or cortical infarcts and small noncortical infarcts. Clinical outcomes were recorded during follow-up. Associations of ECV and outcome measures were assessed by multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: There was no independent association between the number of ECVs and infarct prevalence (large noncortical or cortical infarcts and small noncortical infarcts) on baseline bMRI (ECV 1 vs 0: odds ratio [OR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.68-1.24]; ECV ≥2 vs 0: OR, 1.04 [0.72-1.44]) or between ECVs performed during follow-up and new infarcts on bMRI at 2 years (OR, 1.46 [0.54-3.31]). ECVs were not associated with overt stroke or transient ischemic attack (ECV 1 vs 0: hazard ratio [HR], 1.36 [0.88-2.10]; ECV ≥2 vs 0: HR, 1.53 [0.94-2.48]), hospitalization for heart failure (ECV 1 vs 0: HR, 1.06 [0.82-1.37]; ECV ≥2 vs 0: HR, 1.03 [0.77-1.38]), or death (ECV 1 vs 0: HR, 0.90 [0.70-1.15]; ECV ≥2 vs 0: HR, 0.91 [0.69-1.20]).
CONCLUSION: There was no association between ECV performed before enrollment and cerebral infarcts on baseline bMRI or between ECV performed during follow-up and new infarcts at 2 years. Moreover, ECV was not associated with clinical events.