MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00004583-199305000-00027

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 1993

Structured diagnostic interviews and clinicians' discharge diagnoses in hospitalized adolescents.

Aronen E T, Noam G G, Weinstein S R

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

In this study Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-C) and clinicians' discharge diagnoses, as well as clinicians' admission and discharge diagnoses were compared.

METHOD: Patients (N = 163) ages 12 to 16 were interviewed with the DISC-C during the first month of admission. The frequencies for different diagnoses by DISC-C and by clinicians at the time of admission and discharge were tabulated. Kappa coefficients were obtained from cross-tabulated frequencies of DISC and clinicians' discharge diagnoses.

RESULTS

At discharge, the clinicians diagnosed more patients with multiple diagnoses and also diagnosed more patients with conduct and substance abuse disorders, dysthymia, and psychosis than they did at admission. The DISC-C diagnosed more patients with these disorders, except with psychosis, than did clinicians at either admission or discharge. The agreement between the clinicians' discharge and DISC-C diagnoses remained low across the diagnostic categories.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the view that the comprehensiveness and structure of the DISC-C can contribute to the sensitivity of the diagnostic process.

Для цитирования: Aronen E T, Noam G G, Weinstein S R. Structured diagnostic interviews and clinicians' discharge diagnoses in hospitalized adolescents.. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 1993. DOI: 10.1097/00004583-199305000-00027.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.