International journal of psychiatry in medicine · 1993
General health, health care utilization, and medical comorbidity in dysthymia.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Howland R H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the literature on the general health, health care utilization, prevalence, medical comorbidity, and treatment of dysthymia in medical settings.
METHOD: The literature was searched by using MEDLINE and by reviewing the bibliographies of recent publications. Studies were selected that included health data on patients with dysthymia or chronic depression according to DSM-III, DSM-III-R, ICD-9, or RDC criteria, or patients who were described as having persistent depressive symptoms.
RESULTS: This review shows that dysthymic patients are at increased risk for poor general health and frequently use medical services. Compared to the general population, dysthymia is more prevalent in primary care and among patients with various medical and neurological conditions, sleep disorders, chronic fatigue, hypothyroidism, and somatoform disorders. Pharmacotherapy is effective, but has not been well studied. Non-tricyclic antidepressants might be especially useful. Psychotherapy studies are virtually non-existent.
CONCLUSIONS: Although dysthymia is considered a minor depressive condition, these findings show that it is a significant public health problem, comparable to major depression. Recent efforts to improve the recognition and treatment of major depression in medical settings, therefore, should be extended to include the entire spectrum of depressive disorders. Future studies should investigate the type and pattern of medical comorbidity and health care utilization, different antidepressant and psychosocial therapies, and the clinical and biological correlates of treatment response in different chronic depressive subtypes in medical settings and compare them to major depressive and subsyndromal depressive conditions.
METHOD: The literature was searched by using MEDLINE and by reviewing the bibliographies of recent publications. Studies were selected that included health data on patients with dysthymia or chronic depression according to DSM-III, DSM-III-R, ICD-9, or RDC criteria, or patients who were described as having persistent depressive symptoms.
RESULTS: This review shows that dysthymic patients are at increased risk for poor general health and frequently use medical services. Compared to the general population, dysthymia is more prevalent in primary care and among patients with various medical and neurological conditions, sleep disorders, chronic fatigue, hypothyroidism, and somatoform disorders. Pharmacotherapy is effective, but has not been well studied. Non-tricyclic antidepressants might be especially useful. Psychotherapy studies are virtually non-existent.
CONCLUSIONS: Although dysthymia is considered a minor depressive condition, these findings show that it is a significant public health problem, comparable to major depression. Recent efforts to improve the recognition and treatment of major depression in medical settings, therefore, should be extended to include the entire spectrum of depressive disorders. Future studies should investigate the type and pattern of medical comorbidity and health care utilization, different antidepressant and psychosocial therapies, and the clinical and biological correlates of treatment response in different chronic depressive subtypes in medical settings and compare them to major depressive and subsyndromal depressive conditions.