MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_393_25

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of postgraduate medicine · 2025

A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing arterolane-piperaquine vs. artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria.

Mondal A, Basu A, Modak D C, Goswami R P

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) is the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended first-line therapy for falciparum malaria. However, recent concern is ACT resistance. Arterolane-piperaquine is a synthetic alternative to ACT. Our objective was to determine the safety and efficacy of arterolane-piperaquine in comparison with artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of falciparum malaria.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the safety and efficacy of arterolane maleate and piperaquine phosphate for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Clinical Trials.gov and MedRxiv. Search results were screened by title, abstract, and full text before inclusion into the study. Meta-analysis of risk difference between arterolane-piperaquine and artemether-lumefantrine in regard to safety and efficacy was done using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. One RCT had a high risk of bias, while the other three studies had a low risk of bias. The 28-day polymerase chain reaction (PCR) corrected risk difference between the artemether-lumefantrine and arterolane-piperaquine was 0 (95% confidence interval -0.02 to 0.02), whereas the PCR uncorrected risk difference was 0.11 (95% confidence interval -0.06 to 0.27). On 42-day follow-up, the PCR uncorrected risk difference was 0.17 (95% confidence interval -0.05 to 0.38), while the PCR-corrected risk difference was 0.01 (95% confidence interval -0.01 to 0.03). Adverse effect profile was similar with risk difference of at least one adverse effect being -0.01 (95% confidence interval -0.02 to 0.00). The commonly reported adverse effects of arterolane-piperaquine were vomiting, anemia, and pain abdomen.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that arterolane-piperaquine is non-inferior to artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria.

Для цитирования: Mondal A, Basu A, Modak D C, Goswami R P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing arterolane-piperaquine vs. artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria.. Journal of postgraduate medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_393_25.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.