Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2014
Use of plerixafor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization failure in children.
Клинический случайКлиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Emir Suna, Demir Hacı Ahmet, Aksu Tekin, Kara Abdurrahman, Özgüner Meltem, Tunç Bahattin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization is usually performed following chemotherapy plus G-CSF in children. This standard approach may not be successful in some heavily pretreated patients undergoing mobilization. Plerixafor (AMD3100) has been used in adults as a second line mobilizing agent. Our aim is to analyze our experiences with plerixafor in children.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated three children who received plerixafor as a second line stem cell mobilizing agent in our department in the 2010-2012 period. Data including age, sex, diagnosis, previous chemotherapy, radiotherapy details, previous harvest attempts, adverse reaction, and harvest outcome were analyzed.
RESULTS: We used plerixafor in combination with G-CSF and chemotherapy or with only G-CSF seven times in three patients. All three patients were treated with different multiple chemotherapy regimens prior to stem cell harvest and failed earlier mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF. The diagnoses were relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma in two and recurrent Ewing's sarcoma in one patient. We used plerixafor in combination with G-CSF and chemotherapy or with only G-CSF seven times in three patients. The harvest was successful in four of seven attempts. No adverse reaction was observed in the patients.
CONCLUSION: The success rate is four out of seven attempts (57%) in our group. Although the data regarding the use of plerixafor in children is scarce, our experience also supports its use in poor mobilizer children. The use of plerixafor in children results in effective increases in peripheral stem cell counts and reduces the risk of mobilization failure.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated three children who received plerixafor as a second line stem cell mobilizing agent in our department in the 2010-2012 period. Data including age, sex, diagnosis, previous chemotherapy, radiotherapy details, previous harvest attempts, adverse reaction, and harvest outcome were analyzed.
RESULTS: We used plerixafor in combination with G-CSF and chemotherapy or with only G-CSF seven times in three patients. All three patients were treated with different multiple chemotherapy regimens prior to stem cell harvest and failed earlier mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF. The diagnoses were relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma in two and recurrent Ewing's sarcoma in one patient. We used plerixafor in combination with G-CSF and chemotherapy or with only G-CSF seven times in three patients. The harvest was successful in four of seven attempts. No adverse reaction was observed in the patients.
CONCLUSION: The success rate is four out of seven attempts (57%) in our group. Although the data regarding the use of plerixafor in children is scarce, our experience also supports its use in poor mobilizer children. The use of plerixafor in children results in effective increases in peripheral stem cell counts and reduces the risk of mobilization failure.