Indian journal of pediatrics · 2021
Comparison of Alternative Lipid Emulsions on Morbidities in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Preterms.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zübarioğlu Adil Umut, Dursun Mesut
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes of using different alternative lipid emulsions for longer durations in babies who are at high risk for preterm morbidities.
METHODS: Preterm infants born ≤ 30 wk receiving SMOFlipid versus Clinoleic with longer durations (≥ 14 d) were included in this retrospective study. The authors compared demographic features, clinical applications, and morbidities between epochs: epoch 1 (Clinoleic, July 2017-June 2018) versus epoch 2 (SMOFlipid, July 2018-June 2019).
RESULTS: A total of 91 infants were included in the study. In bivariate analysis; moderate bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (p = 0.000) and composite outcome [BPD, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) needed treatment, cholestasis and late-onset sepsis and/or mortality] rates were significantly higher (p = 0.043) in Clinoleic group. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, it was found that the type of lipid emulsion used had no significant effect on these morbidities.
CONCLUSIONS: Since both groups had comparable morbidity and mortality, both lipid emulsions are equally safe in preterm babies requiring parenteral nutrition.
METHODS: Preterm infants born ≤ 30 wk receiving SMOFlipid versus Clinoleic with longer durations (≥ 14 d) were included in this retrospective study. The authors compared demographic features, clinical applications, and morbidities between epochs: epoch 1 (Clinoleic, July 2017-June 2018) versus epoch 2 (SMOFlipid, July 2018-June 2019).
RESULTS: A total of 91 infants were included in the study. In bivariate analysis; moderate bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (p = 0.000) and composite outcome [BPD, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) needed treatment, cholestasis and late-onset sepsis and/or mortality] rates were significantly higher (p = 0.043) in Clinoleic group. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, it was found that the type of lipid emulsion used had no significant effect on these morbidities.
CONCLUSIONS: Since both groups had comparable morbidity and mortality, both lipid emulsions are equally safe in preterm babies requiring parenteral nutrition.